Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Schwarzenegger?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:02 PM
Original message
President Schwarzenegger?
Heard this on the news last night.

<clips>

Movement Afoot to Amend Constitution for Arnold

Based on his win in Tuesday's California governor recall election, Arnold Schwarzenegger must now be considered the frontrunner to win the presidency in 2008. When his tenure in the White House ends in January 2009 after a second term in office, George W. Bush will be barred by the Constitution from running for a third term. That unfortunate predicament for George W., who's never been successful in any other job, will open the door to Schwarzenegger, who by then will be the standard-bearer of the national Republican Party, to assume the presidency.

There's just one little hitch in this plan. And it involves another section of the Constitution, the part that prohibits anyone who is not a "native-born citizen" from holding the position of president.

But why, you ask, wouldn't the Republicans just try to push through the Republican-controlled U.S. Congress and the Republican-controlled state houses a plan to get rid of the 22nd Amendment from the Constitution? That strategy would allow George W. to remain in office for as long as the American people would have him.

The answer is that it makes more political sense for the Republicans to promote an immigrant-friendly movement for giving naturalized Americans the right to realize the American dream of becoming president than to promote the heavy-handed and authoritarian concept of a career president.

http://www.counterpunch.com/hand10092003.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. The would be the icing on the cake of American idiocy
Go for it, Fundies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not gonna happen
Nightmare scenario will never happen.

Arnie will be a huge failure as a Governor. Like Chimpco.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. and we can always


:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. And republicans are often Xenophobic
They don't want no damn frenchie comin' in and stealin' some election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Whorrin Hatch is starting the process now!
Hatch is pushing the amendment,

The GOP controls enough state legislatures to let it pass.

It's time to get out before Arnold opens the death camps

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not gonna happen
Because its just not that easy to Amend the U.S. Constitution. An amendment requires a 2/3 majority in the House and Senate, and then has to be ratified by 3/4 of the states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree...
this would take years...may be a good idea...but not likely to be done by 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Seems like you're not familiar with Touchscreen Electronic Voting
By 2008, when it is in place all over the Empire, the Busheviks could pass an Amendment requiring everyone wear slices of bologna in their shoes at all times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. the amendment would have to be approved by state legis.
not necessarily a public vote...slow process unless there's a pressing issue...this is not such an issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. howzabout an amendment requiring "thinner thighs in thirty days?"
starting with Rove and Rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Emperor Ahnold.
His slot:

2001-2009 Emperor Bunnypants*
2009-2017 Emperor Jeb

2017-2025 Emperor I'm-a-Bushevik-but-my-name-ain't-Bush-so-stop-saying-we-are-a-hereditary-Empire

I once though it would be Racicot or Ridge, but Ahnold gives them much better cover and plays into the lie much more ffectively that the Imperial Subjects of Amerika actually choose their own Fuehrer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Jeb's not gonna be happy about letting an interloper take his
place in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. You need....
2/3rds of each house of Congress, the Presidents Signature, and
38 State legislatures and their Governors Signature to pass an
amendment to the constitution! The average time it takes to pass a Consitutional amendment is 8 YEARS!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not gonna happen that quick...but a good idea
The 'natural born citizen' restriction should be removed. It is only fair. Plus it would cut both ways. It would allow Jennifer Granholm of Michigan to run too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It would also allow George Soros to run
I wouldn't mind seeing a very successful moderate business man (unlike the current failure) running the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Takes years to do this.
Do not count on it, the GOP are endlessly doing this. I do think they hate this country they are always trying to change the constitution. They should go back to the country from which they came I swear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. Should Orrin Hatch be euthanized?
This Hatch bastard talked Kenneth Starr into persecuting Clinton when Starr was going to quit and go back to teaching. What bag of goodies did he promise Starr?

Now the bastard wants to ORRINate on our Constitution and to allow Bush's fellow Nazi worshipper to become President. (I guess by then the formality of being elected will be all but waived)

Prescott Bush + Auschwitz
Papa Bush + JFK sewer assassin
W awol from the service
Papa Bush + Oct. 18, 1980 treason
W + Bin Laden= Arbusto Oil Company

Stop the sh*t while you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC