The day that Iraqi anger exploded in the face of the British occupiers

[norml]

The day that Iraqi anger exploded in the face of the British occupiers
By Helen McCormack
Published: 20 September 2005


The dramatic events began to unfold just before dawn yesterday, when two British nationals were detained by Iraqi authorities. It emerged later that they were British soldiers. Dressed in plain clothes - according to some they were wearing traditional Arab dress - the two men had been driving in an unmarked car when they arrived at a checkpoint in the city.

In the confrontation that followed, shots were fired, and two Iraqi policemen were shot, one of whom later died. The Iraqi authorities blamed the men, reported to be undercover commandos, and arrested them.

Mohammed al-Abadi, an official in the Basra governorate said that the two men had looked suspicious to police. "A policeman approached them and then one of these guys fired at him. Then the police managed to capture them," he said.

"They refused to say what their mission was. They said they were British soldiers and ask their commander about their mission," he added.


snip


http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article313848.ece

[Team44Car]

1. They do not mention that the unmarked car was full of explosives

That is a key factor.

[norml]

2. British "Undercover Soldiers" Caught driving Booby Trapped Car

British "Undercover Soldiers" Caught driving Booby Trapped Car
"They refused to say what their mission was."


September 20, 2005
Reuters



The following Reuters report raises some disturbing questions.

Why were undercover British "soldiers" wearing traditional Arab headscarves firing at Iraqi police?

The incident took place just prior to a major religious event in Basra.

The report suggests that the police thought the British soldiers looked "suspicious". What was the nature of their mission?

Occupation forces are supposesd to be collaborating with Iraqi authorities. Why did Britsh Forces have to storm the prison using tanks and armoured vehicles to liberate the British undercover agents?

"British forces used up to 10 tanks " supported by helicopters " to smash through the walls of the jail and free the two British servicemen."

Was there concern that the British "soldiers" who were being held by the Iraqi National Guard would be obliged to reveal the nature and objective of their undercover mission?


snip


http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050920&articleId=972

[Team44Car]

3. Damn al Qaida, this is all Zarqawi's fault!

Also Sadam and Bin Laden. And Iran.
And Syria. But especially Iran. And Chavez.

(And maybe the Dalai Lama.)

This is one extreme over-the-top fuck up.
How can they cover this up? Will anybody notice?
Will anybody care?

[muriel_volestrangler]

4. Because it's highly doubtful that it was

The al Jazeera report showed machine guns and an anti-tank weapon, but did not talk about explosives. The idea of explosives seems to come from this:

As their medical kit was searched, a policemen cautioned his colleagues that the black bag filled with medicine may have a bomb inside.

It may have been another joke. But some Iraqis may take it seriously after two and a half years of suicide bombings, shootings and kidnappings that have plagued the country since U.S. and British troops toppled Saddam Hussein.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/GEO053789.htm