I've always found USA Today to be moderately conservative and distinctly pro-Republican. Imagine my surprise to find this editorial today:
Listening to lawmakers call for spending cuts to finance rebuilding along the Gulf Coast brings to mind the famous scene of hypocrisy in Casablanca. Lacking a better pretext for closing Rick's Café, the corruptible Capt. Renault declares: "I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!" Just then a café employee hands him a bag and says, "Your winnings, sir."
The current hypocrisy is that lawmakers who participated in the spending, borrowing and tax-cutting binge that put the nation in hock are now clamoring for spending cuts to offset storm costs. They, like Capt. Renault, have a hard time claiming the moral high ground.
To put things in context, estimated costs of hurricanes Katrina and Rita of $250 billion equal about 15% of the $1.7 trillion the government has borrowed in the past three years. Eliminating all "pork" from the recently enacted highway law, a much-discussed option, would cover only 10% of the hurricane price tag - even if Congress would do it, which is highly unlikely. For those reasons, it's tempting to treat these calls for cost-cutting with skepticism, if not scorn.
And yet we don't have that luxury. With the national debt at $7.9 trillion just as things are about to worsen with retirement of baby boomers, Washington needs to get religion on fiscal restraint fast.
The editorial continues at
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20050927/cm_usatoday/willstormsjoltcongressintofinancialsanityTo think, I've lived to see the day when I look back at Barry Goldwater's small-government, fiscally responsible brand of conservatism with nostalgia.