from Creative Loafing, David Scott..for ignoring the quagmire
<snip>
U.S. Rep. John Lewis, for example, has been very blunt about his distrust of the Bushies, whom he accuses of deceiving the American public -- not to mention Congress -- with half-baked WMD evidence and disingenuous allegations of ties to terrorism. He and U.S. Rep. Denise Majette were among those who voted against Bush's $87 billion Iraq reconstruction bill.
Then there's U.S. Rep. David Scott. Although Scott joined Bishop in voting for a failed House version of the Senate amendment, he followed up by approving the $87 billion spending package with a speech that reflected no apparent concern over Bush's handling of the war. A subsequent press release blithely explains that he approved the funding because he supports our troops.
It's this kind of go-along-to-get-along crap by Congress that got us into this situation in the first place. The least Scott -- who supported the decision to go to war -- can do is register some misgivings about the way things have turned out and the administration manipulations that got us there.
At a minimum, he could note that the $87 billion for Iraq, on top of untold billions in tax cuts for the wealthy -- which Scott also supported -- will wreak havoc on our economy.
We already have one Democrat in Name Only in Congress; we don't need another.
<snip>
<
http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/news_scalawag.html>