I see the NYTs is no better than CNN when it comes to this...
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/14/claude.allen.arrest.ap/index.html?eref=yahooI love how someone at the White House gets busted in January, leaves the White House a couple of weeks later to "spend more time with the family," then the corporate press calls that person an "ex-aide" when they admit to fraud a couple of weeks later.
The CNN article below is a perfect example of slanted journalism:
1. the headline says *Ex-WH aide*
2. they have the former white house aide statement at the top in bold
3. the caption (which is the second thing people read after the headline & subheading) says “President Bush speaks with his *former* domestic policy adviser Claude Allen in March 2005."
4. the lead sentence says it again.
So they have just beat us over the head with the fact that it is a *former* aide – which is inaccurate but enough of a technicality that they can get away with it. And they do mention once at the bottom that he was in the WH when busted, but most people won’t read to the bottom – it’s called “pyramid style” – put all of the important info at the top and trickle your way down to the bottom b/c it will either get cut or, if it stays, people are not really going to get that far. In this case – keep the facts in the bottom to best sway the public.
Wouldn't the more accurate description read something like: "A top White House aide who was arrested on a theft charge, and who recently left to 'spend more time with his family,' admitted to a store investigator he fraudulently returned merchandise that he didn't buy, according to charging documents" (he was a CURRENT WH aide when he committed the crime, when he was arrested, when he notified the WH about the arrest, and when he resigned for b.s. personal reasons, so why not make that clear?)
* They did the same thing with David Savavian a few months back, who was the WH top procurement officer, when he was busted lying to the grand jury about Abramoff ties.
* And they did the same thing when Libby was indicted, also for LYING to investigators and grand jury re: outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame.
* Dep't of Interior head Gale Norton quit last week "to spend more time with her family." Wonder what she's going to admit to in a week or 2. She's deeply tied up with Abramoff.
Note that every 1 of these crimes is a crime of dishonesty. Something you might think important for people who keep telling us to "trust them" on terror, wiretapping, voting, etc.