Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Artist's homemade gas chamber angers Jewish groups

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:32 AM
Original message
Artist's homemade gas chamber angers Jewish groups
He is known for his provocative stunts, which have included tattooing the backs of drug addicts, and spraying a group of stateless Iraqis with foam. But the Spanish artist Santiago Sierra provoked outrage among Jewish groups in Germany yesterday with his latest work - a homemade gas chamber set up in a former synagogue.

The Mexico-based artist has parked six cars outside the synagogue and attached their exhaust pipes to the building using plastic tubes. It is then filled with deadly gas. Visitors are invited to go inside one by one wearing a gas mask, escorted by a firefighter. Before being allowed in, they have to sign a disclaimer stating they realise the room is full of carbon monoxide.

The project opened to the public on Sunday, creating huge queues, and runs until the end of April.

Sierra says the installation - entitled 245 cubic metres - is a protest against the "banalisation of the Holocaust".

more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I could imagine a whole Holocaust theme park, with rides like Disneyland.
That would really protest against the "banalisation of the Holocaust", as well as having even greater potential for creating queues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We often stand on opposite sides...
...I have to ask this; do you understand what the artist means by "banalisation of the Holocaust?" Because "banalisation" is not a word, but the root "banal" means "trite." So, is he saying that the memory of the Holocaust is used in a "trite fashion" or that the memory of the Holocaust "has been made trite?" And, whom do you think he is accusing of creating the "banalisation of the Holocaust?"

Since I asked you, it is only fair I share my opinion. Personally, I read his rationale as the Holocaust is trite, used to often. My guess is he thinks this done by Jews, but that is just my opinion. Personally, I can't say I care either way, the very idea of pumping gas into a synagogue is beyond disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think it's a play on Hannah Arendt's 'the banality of evil'
Doesn't banal mean "commonplace" and "ordinary"? Because Arendt's use of it for Eichmann definately wasn't calling him a trite sort of evil...

Violet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Definition
"Banal" does mean "commonplace" and "ordinary." This is why I am having such a difficult time understanding what the artist is trying to say. Does his "protest against the "commonplace-ness" or "ordinariness" of the Holocaust" mean he thinks the Holocaust was "commonplace" and "ordinary"? To me, it sounds as if he is denigrating the Holocaust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It took me a while to find this thread again...
I'm not really understanding what he's trying to say either. I thought at first that he was protesting at the public perception of the Holocaust, but I don't think banal is a way that most people view the Holocaust though some historians do point out that the machinery of genocide in the case of the perpetrators was one of banality and impersonal bureaucracy. But I think the view of historians and that of the public when it comes to banality would be different. And if this guy was protesting the public's banalisation of the Holocaust, wouldn't it make more sense to do something to really shock people? So I think he might be denigrating the Holocaust, but I really can't be sure coz I don't really get what it is exactly that he's protesting against...

Violet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Confusion abounds
I lost my first post to you because this thread was moved. But, I agree...what the hell is he trying to say? Even if he is trying to "respect" those lost in the Holocaust, I don't think this was a good way to go about it. This is, IMO, the same as setting fire to a Mosque and saying 'this represents the loss suffered by Muslims,' or 'flogging an African-American with an American flag whip' and stating it is 'protesting the banalitization of slavery.' His "art" leaves something to be desired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I think he's an attention whore myself.
The banality of evil is one of Arendt's better thoughts, but I'm sure she wasn't thinking of something like this. And I would agree with your speculation as to what he thinks he is thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. How would the people be feeling?
On the one hand, I can't help feeling repelled by this "artist".

But on the other hand, someone is taken into the synagogue wearing a gas mask, knowing they are surrounded by deadly gas. It would leave you feeling rather vulverable and afraid. Perhaps it would really help peope to understand something. Empathy is so rare in our world, anything that helps teach people empathy is not altogether bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC