|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
JPZenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 01:48 PM Original message |
Field and Stream Magazine Attacks Bush's Environmental Policies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. They should have done it in 2003 and 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. This should be crossposted in the environment/energy forum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JPZenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. You Call this a Wetland? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 01:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I wonder if Gale Norton included hog-waste lagoons in her "wetlands" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 01:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. If it prompts readers to vote Dem this next election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fawkes (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 10:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. It's a tough issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-14-06 01:44 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. True enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-17-06 04:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. Hi Fawkes!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. This is great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'd love to see the republicans loose the sportsman & hunting lobby. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-14-06 08:13 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. If gun-404 urban politicians will lay off the ban-nonhunting-guns crusade, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-15-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Now why the fuck would anyone want the gun crazies on their side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-15-06 08:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. "Assault weapons"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-16-06 08:46 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Big Deal. So The Laws Might Need Some Fine-Tuning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-16-06 01:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Any "fine tuning" needed has already been done... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-16-06 03:19 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. There's no reason to let crazies and criminals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-17-06 07:13 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Since they are almost never used in crimes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-17-06 07:22 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Geeze, Ben, so we should wait until they are? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-17-06 08:31 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Well, it's been 80 to 140 years now, depending on your definition... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-17-06 06:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. In other words there have been more than enough crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 09:06 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Actually, no, there haven't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 04:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Actually, yes, there have.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 05:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Facts like this, you mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 07:13 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Yeah, keep on pretending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 07:31 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Which ban? The expired Federal one that banned bayonet lugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-16-06 03:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Yes, Ben, we all know you're jonesing for assault weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-17-06 07:04 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. It's the prohibitionists who keep bringing up this crap... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-17-06 07:23 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. In other words, citizens want these guns off the market |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-17-06 09:07 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Oh, that must be why nearly every state has considered and REJECTED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-17-06 06:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Yeah, the GOP and the gun lobby are pieces of shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 10:04 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Only if you deceive them as to what the ban actually covers... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 04:20 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Which you're utterly unable to do..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 05:09 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Dispute the following FACTS, then: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 07:14 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. More wailing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 07:24 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Who's crying? The ban was DEFEATED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-18-06 07:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. More wailing on your part.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DinahMoeHum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. This is what will help the Dems win in the rural regions and the South. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-14-06 08:09 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Listened to the interview on Here and Now on Monday... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-13-06 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. more wow. I don't see how he can stay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JPZenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-14-06 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
14. Third Article in Field and Stream: Where Will Our Children Hunt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-17-06 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
28. 5 Years Late and Several Million Dollars Short |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC