Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Donald Rumsfeld: Genius or Hero? (By Art Levine)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 02:14 PM
Original message
Donald Rumsfeld: Genius or Hero? (By Art Levine)
Edited on Wed Apr-19-06 02:22 PM by norml
Donald Rumsfeld: Genius or Hero?

Commentary: The Defense Secretary clearly knows something about “fantasyland.”

By Art Levine


Photo: KRT/George Bridges

April 18, 2006

“I do not believe Secretary Rumsfeld is the right person to fight that war based on his absolute failures in managing the war against Saddam in Iraq.”
-- Maj. Gen. Charles H. Swannack Jr.(ret.), quoted in the New York Times, April 18, 2006.

“It is just not useful to get into fantasyland.”
-- Donald Rumsfeld, commenting at an April 11 press conference on reports of Iran war plans.

Donald Rumsfeld apparently knows something about “fantasyland.” Here’s the way he imagined the U.S. attack on Afghanistan and the Iraq war would turn out by now, as it might be reported by the New York Times:

RUMSFELD'S TRIUMPH
Three years later, Iraq’s success confounds critics, wins praise. Stable, prosperous Iraq affirms new DOD strategy.

By Michael Gordon
Published: April 19, 2006
News Analysis

WASHINGTON, April 19, 2006 – A little more than three years after the invasion of Iraq, which went forward amid a chorus of criticism, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is riding a new wave of respect and praise from both inside and outside the Pentagon. As the retired Mideast commander, Marine Corps Gen. Anthony C. Zinni, the former head of the United States Central Command, said on Meet the Press recently, “You’ve got to admire him for sticking to his guns. Rumsfeld ignored the nay-sayers who said it couldn’t be done his way, and he turned out to be right.”

In Baghdad, Prime Minister Ahmed Chalabi presides over a national unity government where the once-fractious Sunni, Shia and Kurdish religious groups are working together in a prosperous post-Saddam Iraq, with oil production soaring more than 300% over pre-war levels. In fact, the war and reconstruction effort, which the then-White House economic adviser Lawrence Lindsay famously speculated might cost as much as an astounding $200 billion, has largely been self-financed through Iraqi oil revenues since the bulk of U.S troops left in September, 2003. “There’s a lot of money to pay for this that doesn’t have to be U.S. taxpayer money,” Mr. Rumsfeld’s then-deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, the World Bank president who won last year’s Nobel Peace Prize for his work promoting democracy in the Mideast, presciently told Congress in 2003. And to the surprise of some Congressional critics who direly forecasted a Vietnam-style “quagmire,” under Mr. Rumsfeld’s direction the departing U.S. military left behind only a token force to offer support and technical assistance to a well-regarded 400,000-man Iraqi Army.

The role of the highly disciplined Iraqi army, beaten down by years of tyrannical rule under Hussein, has been perhaps the biggest success story of Mr.Rumsfeld’s strategic plan. Surprisingly supportive of U.S. goals, many Iraqi field-level soldiers eventually returned to their posts following the initial demobilization of the entire Iraqi army and its Baathist leadership, a strategic move approved by Mr. Rumsfeld to show the populace that the U.S. was dedicated to ending torture and oppression practiced by the old Iraqi Army. (This only added to the sometimes boisterous adulation of the U.S. troops in Iraq displayed in street demonstrations.) The enthusiastic new and returning troops that made up the rebuilt Iraq Army were then offered short but effective “refresher courses” by U.S. military advisors.

The result of all this reform? The Iraqi soldiers have quelled virtually all remaining resistance from a relative handful of “dead-enders,” as Mr. Rumsfeld calls them, in the once-notorious “Sunni Triangle,” which served as Hussein’s stronghold. The strength of the U.S.-backed Iraqi forces and the growing popular support for the democratically-elected Chalabi regime also effectively deterred efforts by Al-Qaeda and its allies, including the now-isolated Jordanian fugitive Musab Al-Zarqawi, to gain a foothold in Iraq. Bin Laden’s capture in Afghanistan in December 2002, of course, was a propaganda coup that undermined terrorist recruiting and the spread of Islamist ideology worldwide.


snip


http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2006/04/rumsfelds_fantasy.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rumsfeld is starting to make Douglas Feith look smart.
And Tommy Franks (no genius himself) called Feith the dumbest fuck on the planet.
Must be something in the water? Can't be depleted Uranium, the bastards never get close enough to a battlefield for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. rumsfeld is a hero and a genius
to the dumbfuck members of the bush base. They have to think that way. To think or share the truth would expose them as the dumb motherfuckers they are. And on this day, no doubt, Timothy Mcveigh memorials are being dusted off in bush backers households.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Torturer and scoundral...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not Even Close!
Maybe in Bushworld, but on planet Earth, he's just the latest incarnation of evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Are those my only 2 choices: genius or hero?
Gee.....this is so tough.....which one will I choose?

He can't be a genius because he's made THOUSANDS 1,000's (count 'em) of tacitcal mistakes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And he can't be a hero because now I've found out that he PERSONALLY supervised the torture of people in Gitmo.

(shakes head) you need to give me some more adjectives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Blood Sucking Vampire or Goulish Flesh Eating Zombie..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC