Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dumb on Purpose: Conservative Philosophy and our Iran Predicament

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:32 AM
Original message
Dumb on Purpose: Conservative Philosophy and our Iran Predicament
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 10:33 AM by applegrove
Dumb on Purpose: Conservative Philosophy and our Iran Predicament

by Lorelie Kelly
Huffington Post


"The fact that the Bush administration is even mentioning nuclear options in dealing with Iran is only partly the last stand of the Neo-Cons. Likewise, it is caused by something more than a president whose political base is buckling up for their apocalyptic joyride. No, our predicament is deeper than that. It is a product of a conservative philosophy that has purposefully broken our open and fact-based democratic government.

Today's bad dream of policy options toward Iran is not an accident, but an outcome.

In a democracy that works well, government cares for the institutional memory of big, important public interest issues -- like the dangers of nuclear weapons. And long serving bureaucrats provide the steady ballast that keeps the government moving toward objective common goods -- like reducing such dangers. That way, government weathers the storm of deviant Executives and keeps the public interest intact. The conservatives in power today are of a breed that does not believe in government virtue nor common goods. Katrina-style government is the result of our failure to maintain a dedicated federal staff for disaster relief. The Bush Administration's ability to threaten the nuclear option with little articulate resistance is at least partly because -- for decades -- conservatives have marginalized or destroyed our government's ability to pursue arms control. Here are three examples:

ACDA

The Arms Control & Disarmament Agency (ACDA) was established in 1961 during the administration of President John F. Kennedy to negotiate arms control treaties, both bilateral (U.S.-Soviet) and with many nations (such as the Chemical Weapons Convention). It was an independent foreign affairs agency that reported directly to the President as well as to the Secretary of State (who you report to means everything in the DC food chain). Thanks to a reorganization championed by arch-conservative Senator Jesse Helms, ACDA was folded into the State Department and arms control has since steadily moved to the margin. Many specialists with decades of experience have either retired or left.

...SNIP"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lorelei-kelly/dumb-on-purpose-conserva_b_19889.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. neocons
Don't ever forget that the neocons objective is to bankrupt and dismantle the fed. gov. so there are no checks on their power!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They want to weaken some parts of government - not the military.
Not the tie to huge corporations. Just the parts they deem useless. Like Fema.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC