Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flailing U.S. mission in Iraq hinges on 'Battle of Baghdad'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:41 AM
Original message
Flailing U.S. mission in Iraq hinges on 'Battle of Baghdad'
---

The reality is that the United States is flailing as Iraq hovers between a low-grade civil war and the full-blown version. Most of today's violence is among rival religious sects; the insurgency linked to al-Qaeda terrorists, which ignited the sectarian violence, trails well behind.

That reality leads to a hard truth: The United States probably has one last shot at achieving minimal stability in a unified Iraq. Bush's rhetoric aside, that is the best outcome that can be reasonably hoped for at this point.

Accomplishing it means preventing an all-out civil war long enough that Iraq's fledgling government - which has been in office barely three months - has a decent chance of taking control, particularly of the proliferating sectarian militias. If that can't be done, it's hard to see a useful role for U.S. forces.

Certainly, it's difficult to know just when the line into full-scale civil war is crossed. Bosnia in the 1990s provides a useful yardstick. The point of no return there came when extremists managed to stir passions to the point at which neighbors felt they had no choice but to turn on their neighbors. That hasn't yet happened in Iraq, where polls show most Iraqis crave a normal life.

USA Today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Catapult that propaganda, USA Today.
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 10:18 AM by NCevilDUer
AQ didn't ignite the sectarian violence - that was the result of a black-ops team blowing up the Golden Mosque. Before that happened almost all the focus was on the occupation troops - AQ was being marginalized and even attacked by local militias as unwanted outsiders as both Shia and Sunni militias were attacking the occupation. The US had just called off an unsuccessful operation to try to arrest a leader of the Sadr brigade, which threated to spark a general uprising in the south.

Then the Golden Mosque was bombed, an attack for which no-one took credit, and Presto! the attacks against the occupation drop off as the militias begin going at each other, then death squads began taking people off the streets at random, ramping up the tension.

Prior to that happening there were repeated reports of unknown individuals opening fire from unmarked white SUVs on crowds of civilians, like those used by mercenary troops, and then in Basra two brits were found, out of uniform, in a civilain vehicle with weapons and bombs - they were arrested by Iraqi police but were busted out of prison by British special forces, never to be heard of again.

Can anybody doubt that the civil war is a result of our own policies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was not aware of these events..
although I'm sure there are a few threads on this subject....

Just goes to show you...never trust an occupation force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC