Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bird-Dogging Hillary Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 02:11 PM
Original message
Bird-Dogging Hillary Clinton
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 03:08 PM by Raster
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0901-32.htm

by Nancy Kricorian

In November 2005 Hillary Rodham Clinton sent out a fundraising letter to her constituents. “Part of my job is being a good listener,” she wrote, going on to describe all the good listening she does as the junior senator from New York. She concluded, “Now I’d like to listen to you.”

In the envelope with the letter was a three-page, 18-question “2005 Critical National Issues Survey” addressing a range of topics from jobs to homeland security to separation of church and state. Not one question in the survey mentioned the war in Iraq—an omission that came as no surprise to those of us at the New York chapter of CODEPINK Women for Peace.

At the time Hillary prepared her “questionnaire,” close to 2,300 U.S. troops and more than 100,000 Iraqi civilians had died, and polls showed that most Americans were worried about the war and its ill effects, including rising prices at the gas pump. But somehow, Hillary and her handlers thought that ignoring the war was the strategically smart thing to do. And they were right.

It turns out that Hillary has done a tremendous job—of getting New York Democrats to assume that because right-wing Republicans hate her she must oppose the war. Most New York Democratic voters also don’t realize that she co-sponsored an amendment to ban flag-burning, is against marriage equality for gays and lesbians, supports the death penalty, votes consistently for Star Wars appropriations and has served on the board of Wal-Mart for six years. Yet, she is consistently touted as the “liberal Democrat from New York.”

<snip, more>

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0901-32.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hate to break it to you but there are some miss truths in that article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well point them out
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Please, point them out. And please provide proof they are "miss truths"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sipsake Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Splitting hairs
Technically, Hillary didn't sponsor an ammendment to the constitution, she sponsored a statute. Moynihan, Edwards, Graham, Kerry and other democrats voted for it as well. Hillary voted against a constitutional ammendment.

Sen. Clinton voted to pass fiscal defense spending authorizations, not "star wars" appropriations. These defense spending authorizations are voted on every year and yes some of them have included funding the strategic missle defense system. In 2004, Senator Byrd was the only Democrat to vote against the spending authorization.

Project Vote Smart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC