Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "O" Word: The Great American Oligarchy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:44 AM
Original message
The "O" Word: The Great American Oligarchy
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 01:58 AM by Radio_Lady
September 2 / 3, 2006

The "O" Word
The Great American Oligarchy




By STEPHEN FLEISCHMAN

I never thought I'd ever hear the United States of America called an "oligarchy". But now I have.

My dictionary says an oligarchy is a form of government where most or all political power effectively rests with a small segment of the society. As Wikipedia, the popular online encyclopedia, puts it, "Oligarchies are often controlled by a few powerful families whose children are raised and mentored to be heirs of the power of the oligarchy, often at some sort of expense to those governed." Does that sound like the administration of George W. Bush?

For all my life, ever since grade school, I've been taught that the United States of America is a paragon of democracy. We have popular elections on every level -- local, state and Federal. We have two houses of Congress, a President and a Supreme Court, a system of checks and balances, a Constitution second to none, and a Bill of Rights, the pride of our forefathers. Most Americans see our country as Ronald Reagan did -- the shining city on the hill --beacon to the world.

But here we are, today, when, according to the most recent CNN/USA Today poll, six of ten Americans see the Iraq war as a huge mistake and want our troops out of there, yet they are incapable of making that happen. Why? It's simple. It's the oligarchy that's keeping them there -- that tight little group around Bush in the White House and Rumsfeld in the Pentagon, who run things for corporate feeders. You know who they are -- Halliburton, Bechtel, and Lockheed Martin, to name a few of the no-bid war profiteers. They can make 18 billion dollars, allocated for the reconstruction of Iraq, disappear in the blink of an eye. That is really slight of hand.

The war in Iraq is the best example of an oligarchy at work-produced and managed to make money and to secure the remaining reserves of oil in the world. As they say, the world's oil has "peaked". It's all down hill from here, so we better grab it before somebody else does. To do this, we've got to keep a perpetual war spinning in the best oil-producing areas, the Middle East and the Caspian region. (We'd do it in Venezuela if we could.) With Iraq as a pivotal base, the oligarchy is planning to stay there into the foreseeable future. Any talk about drawing down troops is just that, talk -- a tease offered for the 2006 mid-term elections. Using Iraq as a military base also explains the moves on former Soviet states, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan and others in the Russian orbit --targets of the giant oil conglomerates.

Oligarchies operate in secret. They spawn conspiracy theories. The 9/11 World Trade Towers collapse, for example. That garnered more than a million references in Google. Enough conspiracy theories for everyone. But the event caused a number of reputable construction engineers to raise their eyebrows. They saw it as a controlled demolition, as did Dr. Steven E. Jones, Physicist and Archaeometrist of Brigham Young University, who has done a major investigation on his own. He asks, why was this possibility not investigated by the 9/11 Commission and other governmental investigating agencies at the time? Not much help from the mainstream media, either. They accepted the Commission finding that it was an al-Qaeda attack. That's been the conventional wisdom ever since.

Everything is up for questioning. Does the media have the chutzpah to investigate any of them? No way. The Israel Lobby? No way. Untouchable.

Link to the full article here.

Stephen Fleischman, television writer-director-producer, spent thirty years in Network News at CBS and ABC, starting in 1953. In 1959, he participated in the formation of the renowned Murrow-Friendly "CBS Reports" series. In 1983, Fleischman won the prestigious Columbia University-Dupont Television Journalism Award. In 2004, he wrote his memoir. See: www.ARedintheHouse.com



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Your comments? Appreciate the "Greatest Page" recommendation
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 02:10 AM by Radio_Lady
from an unknown DUer! :)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Was this guy born yesterday? We've had an oligarchy
since our founding. The families off the Mayflower, voting privileges restricted to land holders ... c'mon ... this ain't nothing new.

What I don't see is a constructive response to the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You may be correct. The mother of * is nee Barbara Pierce, relative
of President Franklin Pierce. Prescott Bush, *' s grandfather really established the family in the Body Politic.

However, to me it's interesting that BECAUSE OF EGALITARIANISM, Ronald Reagan (the saint of republicans) was able to be elected to the office of the presidency. His family ties were nonexistent and his rise to power came from corporations and Hollywood, and to some degree, "the People". And it's interesting that in 2006 there are certain families that don't make a grab for power (like the Roosevelts) as their counterparts who, in their deluded mind, believe political offices belong to them because of DNA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Commentary appreciated -- an insightful response!
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 11:23 PM by Radio_Lady
Thanks so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC