Membership Has Its Benefits ... Doesn't It?
It's nice to live in a well-mannered neighborhood, but is it worth forfeiting freedom and diversity?
By Lyla Fox
Newsweek
Sept. 18, 2006 issue - It's in a gated community," my friend said, as she exuberantly described the home her nephew had purchased. I knew she wasn't aware that for me the words "gated community" double for "exclusive," "private," even "discriminatory." My friend didn't realize my concern that we are far too controlling about who lives next door to us and what they're up to. We may give lip service to the words "tolerance" and "diversity," but for the middle and upper-middle class those words don't seem to include the poor, the ragtag and the slothful. Heaven help anyone who messes up a well-manicured lawn or trips an underground sprinkler system. We'll see how tolerant we are then.
(snip)
Nationally, we engage in debates over what to do about illegal border crossings, NSA wiretaps and congressional intrusions. But locally, I see more and more of my friends embarrassingly eager to describe how their homeowners association polices garage doors that are left up, clothes that are hung on "illegal" clotheslines and houses that violate the "approved colors" code. "The association doesn't approve of that," they say. Though people can argue that we have the freedom to choose whether we live in those communities, I am concerned that we too quickly hand over our personal choices to the sanctimonious marshals of the homeownership associations. In making sure the rules are obeyed, we are eschewing personal freedom. It's a micro-stamp of approval of the Big Brother threat most of us struggle against. We are acquiescing too easily to the idea that others have every right to determine our every right.
(snip)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14752498/site/newsweek/