The president deserves even more resistance to his method of waging war on terror.
September 17, 2006
PRESIDENT BUSH MADE FULL USE of the 9/11 anniversary last week. In his speeches and remarks, he reminded the nation of the stakes involved in what he calls the war on terror, and he conveyed a renewed sense of urgency to prevent attacks and bring those responsible for 9/11 to justice. Yet if his goal was also to pressure Congress into acting as a rubber stamp for the administration's questionable legal tactics in conducting this war, it was a disappointing week for the president — and a heartening one for anyone outside the White House.
On the treatment of detainees, the president has been especially disingenuous. He has never been a fan of international law, so it's absurd for him to pretend to want to "clarify" the Geneva Convention. What he clearly wants to do is gut the treaty's humanitarian protections for wartime detainees, with an eye toward retroactively legitimizing abusive CIA interrogation tactics used on terrorism suspects ...
At issue is the Convention's Common Article 3, drafted in 1949, barring "outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment." The administration considers this language inconveniently vague and would like to tinker with it to legalize an "alternative set of procedures" employed by CIA operatives in secret facilities.
As Powell wrote in a letter to McCain, speaking in support of the Geneva Convention, "The world is beginning to doubt the moral basis of our fight against terrorism." No matter how grave the challenges the nation faces, those doubts spread every day that Bush refuses to accept that there are checks and balances on his power.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-ed-torture17sep17,1,2535593.story?coll=la-news-comment