At E. Coli Hunt's End, A Safety Standards Gap
By Annys Shin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 22, 2006; Page D01
It took exactly 14 days from the time state health officials in Wisconsin noticed five cases of E. coli O157:H7 in the same county until investigators arrived Wednesday at a field in California's Salinas Valley in search of the bacteria that ended up in bagged spinach and sickened 157 people in 23 states.
The outbreak -- the largest, in terms of victims, caused by fresh produce -- has exposed strengths and weaknesses in the highly fragmented U.S. food safety system. And the extent of it has federal officials talking about imposing tougher regulation.
"There are good agricultural practices out there. . . . The question that will be addressed is: Are they adequate? Are they being followed? Does the industry need to be further regulated to be safe?" said David W. Acheson, a top Food and Drug Administration food safety official.
Even as public health officials have gotten better at identifying the onset of illness borne by raw fruits and vegetables, the rules and procedures to prevent those outbreaks remain weaker than those for meat and poultry, consumer advocates and food safety experts said. And their enforcement relies on the voluntary efforts of growers and processors, and on the FDA, which has responsibility for much of the food supply but nowhere near the authority or resources devoted to the monitoring of meat and poultry.
"The FDA is acting like the fire department after the fire has already started," said Caroline Smith DeWaal, director of food safety for the Center for Science in the Public Interest....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/21/AR2006092101708.html