If it was meant for "his office" - presumably meaning political appointees - then when the scientist wrote his email, the reply would have been "oops, that wasn't meant to go to you, ignore it, it's for us political types". Sacking him shows they were serious about it - until everyone must have told them (a) you can't sack someone for that (b) it's a bloody stupid idea too.
From a union site, about what the scientist actually said:
Andrew Okulitch of the Geological Survey of Canada was sacked after sending an e-mail to colleagues criticizing the directive. Calling it "ridiculous" and "embarrassing," Okulitch vowed to boycott the use of "idiotic buzzwords coined by political hacks."
...
The Salt Spring Island, B.C., man had completed a 35-year career as a senior scientist with the government. He was continuing to work without pay in an office provided (for up to three years) to employees in specialized fields, allowing them to complete work left unfinished at retirement.
Okulitch's sacking backfired on the government when it became public. The partisan directive clashed with the official Harper rhetoric of a new era in politics, and the 'new government' retreated.
Deputy minister Cassie Doyle called Okulitch at his home this week, inviting him to come back to work. However, he has been instructed to apologize for the tone of his e-mail.
http://www.nupge.ca/news_2006/n21se06a.htmOK, the tone wasn't the best for someone who has to work with others; but Okulitch was right, and the idiots should have realised that before they sent out the mail.