This is very good. Some points that need to be in the forefront of national and world debate, imho.
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
Making Sure the Money Goes Where It's Supposed To
By ANTHONY RICHTER and SVETLANA TSALIK
Published: December 4, 2003
merica has always lusted after a secure energy supply. Against a background of deteriorating relations with the Arab world, which holds the largest oil reserves, the United States is casting about for new sources of oil in countries like Venezuela, Nigeria, São Tomé and Azerbaijan. With Saddam Hussein gone, Iraq could also become a major supplier.
So intense is the need for oil that the United States often turns a blind eye to problems of governance in those countries — whether the leaders are corrupt, abuse human rights or block any moves toward democracy. This inaction amounts to complicity. It undermines, rather than enhances, American energy security, since repressive regimes are prone to being violently overthrown by people who resent the United States for supporting their oppressors.
It is one of the great paradoxes that countries rich in natural resources tend to have lower growth rates, more debt, worse governance and greater political unrest than their energy-poor neighbors. Vast petroleum profits without oversight allow corruption to flourish. Nigeria, for instance, has earned more than $250 billion for its oil in the last 25 years, yet remains mired in poverty. In Turkmenistan, gas revenues are deposited into a foreign account controlled by the president for life, Saparmurat Niyazov, international financial officials say. These kinds of governments do not make for stable energy suppliers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/04/opinion/04TSAL.html