Bush's Second War

[littlejoe]

With the war in Iraq,and the economy, the electronic and print media have little time and space left for other important issues. Although it is important to underscore the ramifications of Bush's disastrous foreign policy making, there is a second war that his administration is waging that many feel has as much or more cause for concern. It is the war against our environment. It is being fought behind closed doors, with cabinet leaders and captains of industry setting the rules of engagement. Their weapons of mass destruction are money (lots of it) and influence.

This war began in early 2001, when the president set about appointing top cabinet and agency posts. Positions in the White House, the departments of the Interior, Agriculture and Commerce were filled with CEO's and lobbyists from the oil, mining, automobile and chemical industries. From that early point on, they set the stage to lay the groundwork for environmental policies that make Sherman's march to the sea look like child's play.

Some of the WOE (War on the environment) strategists were White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, a lobbyist for the auto industry, now former Interior Secretary Gail Norton, who was a mouthpiece for the chemical and mining industries, Paul O'Niell, chairman of Alcoa, and selected as Treasury secretary, James Connaughton, a mining and chemical industry lobbyist, selected as the Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, Condoleeza Rice, Chevron board member, now National Security Advisor, J. Steven Griles, lobbyist for the mining and chemical industry, now Deputy Secretary of the Interior, and Dick Cheney, chairman of Halliburton. These are but a few of the war council. In all, according to the Sierra Club, more than thirty energy executives, lobbyists and lawyers have been granted high level positions within this administration. Not surprisingly, George Bush received over thirty million dollars in campaign contributions from the oil and gas, mining and timber products industries in his run for the White House.

The first salvo fired in this war was the Bush-Cheney secret energy policy meeting, known in some circles as the Kenneth Lay plan. Since then, the White House has been busy identifying environmental safeguards that industries object to. It has then set out to roll back, weaken, ignore or just plain refuse to enforce existing laws, programs and policies. Their war plan has been swift, precise and all too alarmingly effective.

Toxic site cleanups have been cut in half, due to the president's refusal to re-authorize the pollution tax on industries. Now, the White House expects tax paying citizens to foot the bill for Superfund sites. In another payback to corporate America, this administration has exempted oil and gas companies in certain circumstances from water pollution regulations. The relaxing of mining regulations , which now allow companies to blow the tops off of mountains, endanger hundreds of miles of waterways and wildlife habitats. And, because of loopholes created by regulatory agencies, more than twenty million acres of streams and wetlands, vital to our environment, are threatened to be excluded from protection of the Clean Water Act. This so mine owners and land developers can claim use for their own purposes. The gutting of rules regulating raw sewage discharges by industries has put our drinking water at great risk. This action has sent a clear signal to industries that they can pollute at their discretion with little fear of being caught. And if they are caught, at best they will only get a slap on the wrist. One last act of war which I will cite is the president's "Clear Skies" proposal, outlined in last January's state of the union address. As was mentioned then, his plan to help clean up air pollution would reduce emissions by seventy percent over the next fifteen years. But like so many of his statements, just the opposite is true. In fact, millions more tons of mercury, nitrogen oxide and sulphur dioxide will be permitted into the air per year than what the current laws allow.

The instances of deception and collusion are too numerous to mention, leaving no doubt as to the disturbing and dangerous intent of this administration. While corporations pollute indiscriminately, our leadership and our regulatory agengies turn a blind eye and deaf ears. Rules are sidestepped, loopholes are constantly sought out and exploited, and court challenges by environmental groups are barred.

It's sad to think of how things have become so perverted in our society. Years ago we had the wisdom to create agencies that were committed to the stewardship of our wilderness and our wetlands, our streams, rivers and lakes, as well as our soil and our air. But these days those very departments and agencies have completely abandoned the principles of stewardship, in favor of a dark agenda.

As this administration has adeptly pulled a slight of hand, causing us to focus on the war on terror, they have created a terrifying war in their own right. Let's face it, we are more likely to get hit by lightning than attacked by terrorists. But we are all most likely to suffer the consequences of a ruined environment. We all have to breathe the air. We all have to drink the water. We must not allow more than thirty years worth of responsible environmental legislation be dismantled by immoral politicians and corporate greed. This is a war that we must become engaged in, for if we don't there will be no safe place to live.

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

1. Once the environment is trashed

there is no place to hide. Bush and his handlers don't care. They think their money will protect them. But even money won't help if global warming changes the climate, if air pollution gets so bad no one can breathe.

[JailBush]

2. Screw us.

I worked for government environmental agencies in Alaska and have always considered the environment the #1 issue, though I've channeled most of my energy into education reform in Seattle. Shocked at the extraordinary corruption and lack of education activists in Seattle, I decided to check out the environmental movement. It appears to be a mirror reflection of education: There's virtually no real environmetal group in Seattle, a city that's associated with environmental causes.

That helps explain why our state government is trashing environmental laws while corporations trash the environment, both with impunity.

It's as frightening as it is depressing. Unfortunately, Americans probably won't wake up until much of the damage has been done. Alaska may be melting, but the Lower 48 states have escaped the damage visited on the United Kingdom and France. But I suspect it won't be long before our winter sports industries vanish and a few thousand U.S. citizens die of heat stroke. Then people might start to care.

[KT2000]

4. Have you looked into

the Washington Toxics Coaltion? They have had some successes.

[KT2000]

3. Public Heath=Environment

The right wing has successfully divided publich health from the environment. They even attempted to change the term to "conservation." This way we are supposed to compartmentalize the notion of environment as one of preserving parks and endangered animals.

But most of the the environmental rollbacks of this admin. are direct assaults on the health of our population.

I dont know what it will take to get these issues back together, but there is a direct relationship between ill health and disability, including birth defects and pollution.