Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Smart Surge: Diplomacy By Wesley K. Clark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 04:30 AM
Original message
The Smart Surge: Diplomacy By Wesley K. Clark
Edited on Tue Jan-09-07 04:31 AM by rodeodance

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/07/AR2007010700980.html

The Smart Surge: Diplomacy

By Wesley K. Clark
Monday, January 8, 2007; Page A15

..........
The administration views a troop surge of modest size as virtually the only remaining action in Iraq that would be a visible signal of determination. More economic assistance is likely to be touted, but absent a change in the pattern of violence, infrastructure enhancement simply isn't practical.



Yes, several additional brigades in Baghdad would allow for more roadblocks, patrols and neighborhood-clearing operations. Some initial successes would be evident. But how significant would this be? We've never had enough troops in Iraq. In Kosovo, we had 40,000 troops for a population of 2 million. That ratio would call for at least 500,000 troops in Iraq; adding 20,000 now seems too little, too late.

Further, U.S. troops so far have lacked the language skills, cultural awareness and political legitimacy to ensure that areas "cleared" can be "held." The key would be more Iraqi troops, but they aren't available in the numbers required. Nor are the Iraqi troops reliable enough for the gritty work of dealing with militias and sectarian loyalties. Even if militia fighters in Baghdad can be temporarily suppressed, they could redeploy to continue the fight in other areas.

What the surge would do is put more American troops in harm's way,...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wesin04 Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Clark was right
As he usually is on these matters, Wes Clark has laid it out and called it right. He's been beating the drum for a political and diplomatic solution to this fiasco for years. His appearance in August of 05, along with 3 other retired generals, showed his insight and his vision as he was the only one who correctly predicted where we'd be in Iraq at this time. The others had those flowers still being strewn. To let bush and this neocon administration know you want this madness to end, go to http://securingamerica.com to sign the petition he just put out yesterday to send to bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC