Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Slate: Bush's Baby Einstein Gaffe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:04 AM
Original message
Slate: Bush's Baby Einstein Gaffe
In his Jan. 23 State of the Union address (click here for the video), President Bush paused briefly to pay tribute to a few everyday American heroes who'd been brought to the Capitol to sit beside his wife during the speech. It's a State of the Union tradition that began in 1982, when Ronald Reagan saluted Lenny Skutnik, a federal employee who, two weeks earlier, had plunged into the icy Potomac during a snowstorm to rescue the survivor of an airline crash. For the succeeding 25 years, every January some hapless White House functionary has been called upon to find a few new heroes to park next to the first lady in the House visitor's gallery. The supply was bound eventually to run a little thin, but whoever chose Julie Aigner-Clark, founder of the Baby Einstein Co., should have done a little more research.

...

Baby Einstein is part of what Alissa Quart, in an August 2006 piece in the Atlantic ("Extreme Parenting"), called the Baby Genius Edutainment Complex, an industry that preys on the status anxiety of neurotic parents who, until Aigner-Clark and others told them otherwise, didn't sweat the meritocratic rat race until it was time to place their pint-sized strivers in preschool. That changed in the mid-1990s, when Don Campbell, extrapolating wildly from earlier research involving college students that, Quart writes, has never been duplicated, trademarked the slogan "Mozart effect" and used it to market classical-music CDs for infants. Aigner-Clark followed suit with her Baby Einstein videos in 1997.

"Essentially," Harvard Medical School psychologist Susan Lynn told the Chicago Tribune "Media Mom" (and occasional Slate contributor) Nell Minow in December 2005,

the baby video industry is a scam. There's no evidence that the videos are educational for babies, and a review of the research on babies and videos concludes that while older babies can imitate simple actions from a video they've seen several times, they learn much more rapidly from real life.

http://www.slate.com/id/2158226/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. The obvious thing to consider is
Edited on Fri Jan-26-07 08:18 AM by Progs Rock
that neither Einstein nor Mozart needed videos as a baby.

The repukes need to keep their commercials out of the SOTU address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Give the kids real Mozart records and math toys
All three of my nephews were raised by Baby Einstein, and two of them started speaking so late that they were suspected of being autistic.

A sample of two subjects, obviously, is a poor basis on which to make decisions about millions, but could it hurt to turn the TV off occasionally and get kids interested in math or music?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wondered about that
too. She was a housewife in the burbs who developed a video tape for babies. Start them young watching the tube I guess. I wasn't too impressed by her. But I think they were hurting to find a woman, since all the others were men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yet I like the Leapfrog toys...
I especially like this one:



Then again this is for 8+...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. As a daycare operator..I can conclude that the BEV's are baby-
sitting mesmerizers that aren't even as stimulating as Elmo and Big Bird...How DID we raise our kids before these things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Since my children are adults, I have no experience with
baby videos. However, as a mother of 4, I don't believe that a video is a substitute for the face to face interaction that babies recieve from parents and caretakers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. my folks read to me, played with me, and took me on nature walks ...
I didn't actually see much TV until I was already in primary school. I don't feel that I was deprived by not having baby videos -- somehow I managed to get my PhD and am now teaching college classes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Right wingers fancy themselves educational experts. They are the ones pushing all day academic
Edited on Fri Jan-26-07 11:26 AM by yellowcanine
kindergartens and phonics only reading progeams. Truth is, too much emphasis on academics in kindergarten is a bad idea because it can frustrate kids who aren't ready for it and actually turn them off reading and arithmetic. It is far better to focus on socialization skills and games that teach kids to classify objects. Case in point - my own daughter and several of her classmates from a cooperative kindergarten that focused on those areas. Their first grade public school teacher was upset that this group of kids did not know how to read. Guess what, by Cristmas, every one of those kids was reading above the level of the rest of the class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. I played Stockhausen for my babies
Maybe that's why they all turned out bonkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LouisianaLiberal Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. My first laugh of the day!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. Baby Einstein is not gong to make genius but used wisely is not harmful either.
Kicky who just turned four had partial cranial stenosis. His skull fused too soon. Our family have notoriously big heads so standard tests did not detect it early. He started having symptoms shortly after he turned 12 months. He had horrible headaches and nightmares. He forgot how to talk at 13.5 months. He started falling many, mnay times a day at 14 months. He would wake after an hours sleep sobbing. I finally got through to my son that he had to have his wife tell the doctor about this at 15 months. He was diagnosed at 16 months but surgery did not take place until 18 months. They never gave him any medicine besides ibuprofen or Tylenol for his symptoms.

Mom worked nights and slept during the day. Dad worked days and we all spent evenings together with a very, very fussy child who they blamed me for spoiling. My son would try to calm him for an hour or more overnight and then bring him down for me so he would have enough sleep to do his very physical job the next day.

Having MS I knew a thing or two about pain so I staggered the doses of Tylenol and ibuprofen so that he was never without pain meds when I was in charge and at night the only thing that would get him to sleep after sobbing for a couple hours was Baby Einstein especially the Baby Santa. He didn't care about other "brainy" videos and just plain music did not have the same effect. Before a year he would listen to a few minutes of them and lose interest.

As he recovered he no longer needed them but enjoyed them for 15 or twenty minutes when he was winding down to a nap or bedtime after a storybook. Delightfully He became too active for me to chase 5 days a week and went into regular daycare. His Greatauntie and I have since moved to an apartment

I would never advocate numbing a normal child over long periods of time but if you have fussy child and are working and trying to run a household 30 minutes a couple times a day of Baby Einstein, if they will watch it all, is not going to ruin your child. Our local NPR classical music station does minibiographies of artists and many times I hear people say that their love of music came from exposure to classical music from the old cartoons, the ones people said were mind numbingly bad for us.

BTW. Kicky is now a very healthy, normal, active, four year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC