Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eagleburger: It's nuts, insane, counterproductive and it won't work

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:49 PM
Original message
Eagleburger: It's nuts, insane, counterproductive and it won't work
He's talking about the opulent and heavily staffed American embassy in Baghdad.

"I defy anyone to tell me how you can use that many people. It is nuts . . . it's insane and it's counterproductive . . . and it won't work," says the Republican former secretary of state and member of the Iraq Study Group. "I've been around the State Department long enough to know you can't run an outfit like that."

The nerve center of Iraq reconstruction efforts, housed in an ornate former Saddam Hussein palace with soaring ceilings and its own espresso bar, the embassy in Baghdad is one of the largest foreign missions ever operated by the State Department. Its complexity and expense, some say, hampers reconstruction efforts and drains cash from diplomatic efforts worldwide.

According to a State Department count, about 1,000 federal employees report to the U.S. Embassy in Iraq, not including hundreds of private contractors......At $923 million for the 2006 fiscal year, the budget was 20 times that of the Beijing embassy's that year, according to the State Department. More than two-thirds of the money pays for security.....It is possible for senior employees to earn more than the secretary of state, who makes $186,600 a year.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/01/AR2007030101497.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Congress writes the checks to pay for this
Why don't they stop payment.Hard to see how that would "endanger the troops".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That would require a Democratic Party that wasn't
"in on it". Just like repugs their main interest is in getting re-elected. To get re-elected requires huge amounts of $$. To get huge amounts of $$ requires doing what Corporate America wants you to do......stuff their pockets from the US Treasury and/or allow the legal rape of the American middle-class. Simple enough? The first attempt at a solution is to have strict term limits, after that we need laws governing the use of $$ in federal campaigns with severe punishments for violators.

Of course that's expecting the fox to guard the hen house, not gonna happen. A National referendum on term limits would probably pass overwhelmingly, however we'll never see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC