The Boston Globe, the most widely circulated newspaper in the Massachusetts region, made 120 jobs redundant by outsourcing some positions to India. The trade association representing those workers has been protesting this, and has now gained the support of other local unions and labor leaders to canvass against the company’s offshoring practice.
Chances are that such issues will be picked up by election contestants using anti-offshoring as a peg to gain political mileage in the coming U.S. elections.
Yet, will they be as much a talking point as they were in the campaigns leading up to the 2004 presidential elections when John Kerry and his Democrats, and the Lou Dobbs gang, had stirred up quite a sticky debate?
I would wager that such issues are less likely to get as much attention in 2007 as they did in 2004.
One, the offshoring story is no longer new. More and more companies have demonstrated to shareholders the benefits of cost savings — and even revenue generation — from offshoring.
http://www.globalservicesmedia.com/blog/hottopics/archives/2007/03/outsourcing_an.html<snip> Media attention in the last few years has focused the attention of the common man on Iraq and Afghanistan than on offshoring, leaving people to blame Bush for his foreign policy and companies to mind their own businesses. Even the nuclear bent of Iran and North Korea, and the Russian oil crisis, have fueled more media attention than American companies getting their work done from India and China.