|
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 03:30 PM by higher class
if they are participants in a set-up - in this case dealing with a scheme.
They should only be protected when they are A TOTALLY INDEPENDENT JOURNALIST WHO OPERATES BETWEEN A PERPETRATOR AND A VICTIM OR INDEPENDENT OF ANY SCHEME THAT THEY ARE INVESTIGATING THAT THEY THEMSELVES ARE NOT PARTICIPATING IN. We all know that every so-called journalist in this Brewster-Jennings fiasco - and their employers - are not independent of this White House, but are in fact, operatives for this White House.
To ask rational people to expect that these journalist should be protected operators for the right wing cause is disgusting. Novak, Russert, Miller, Cooper, Woodward - all operators along with the corporations who pay them.
They should be ashamed of themselves. Operatives are operatives first and journalists never when it comes to the independence of our legal system and Constitution.
I think there should be an addendum to make this clear because political operatives are trying to mask this so they may continue to be operatives and protected.
|