Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let Everyone Use What Wall Street Knows

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 03:41 AM
Original message
Let Everyone Use What Wall Street Knows
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/opinion/13winans.html?th&emc=th

<snip>

By R. FOSTER WINANS
Published: March 13, 2007
Doylestown, Pa.

A quarter-century after the Securities and Exchange Commission’s chairman, John Shad, declared that he was going to come down on insider trading with hobnailed boots, the practice continues to flourish. Earlier this month, we heard that a band of Wall Streeters pocketed $14 million in allegedly illegal profits based on inside information, and that unnamed traders may have made more than $5 million knowing ahead of time about a buyout offer for Texas Utilities.

<snip>

Insider trading encompasses the buying or selling of stocks based on non-public information about the securities in question. It is illegal to tip such information to others or to act on tips oneself. Under this definition, insider trading is so common that the only way the Securities and Exchange Commission can enforce laws against it is selectively, much as a patrolman tickets only the red sports car when everyone on the road is speeding. It may make for sexy headlines when a brazen conspiracy is uncovered, or a Martha Stewart is accused. But stopping the sports car slows traffic only for a mile or two. It gives the false impression that the policeman is on the beat, making the financial markets safe for the rest of us.

<snip>

Insiders who cheat commit a crime against their employers or other entities to whom they are obligated, not against some vague moral notion of fairness. A lawyer, accountant or banker who knows about a client company’s unannounced merger and uses that knowledge for personal gain is stealing. He or she is taking what belongs to someone else — information, trade secrets and the like. A Martha Stewart who trades on the basis of a tip from her broker would be free to do so, as would a corporate officer who learns that his company is going to be the subject of a glowing profile in a major business publication.

I’m an expert on this issue. I was convicted of using advance knowledge of the content of my columns for The Wall Street Journal to make money in the stock market. I stole from my employer. In its 1987 decision in my case, the United States Supreme Court couldn’t decide if what I’d done was insider trading. The vote on those counts of my conviction was 4-4. But by 8-0, the justices ruled that it was fraud: stealing.


-MORE-





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds to me like Winans is trying to justify his crime.
But insider trading is a dark and murky world where some get caught and others get away. Technically, anytime you think you have information on a stock that no one else has and you buy based on it, you are insider trading. Maybe what they really need to do is define it better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. corporate america and wall street are the epitome of the culture.......
Edited on Tue Mar-13-07 04:41 AM by Double T
of overindulgence, abuse, obscene wealth and corruption. As the traitors continue the dismantling and sellout/sell off of America and its people, we are continually reminded that these most traitorous acts were done with the full knowledge and support of our own legislators and justices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. sad isn't it

seems the more corrupt you are the better you fit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Of the corruption, By the corruption and For the corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC