Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bartlett offers new explaination: Lax Voter-Fraud Investigations in U.S. Attorneys' Firings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:17 AM
Original message
Bartlett offers new explaination: Lax Voter-Fraud Investigations in U.S. Attorneys' Firings
White House Cites Lax Voter-Fraud Investigations in U.S. Attorneys' Firings

By Amy Goldstein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 14, 2007; Page A06

White House officials, in providing new explanations of how and why several U.S. attorneys were fired in December, have said that President Bush mentioned to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales in October that he had heard complaints from Congress that some federal prosecutors were lax in pursuing voter fraud.

In attributing the firings at least partly to an inattentiveness to voter fraud, the White House is invoking a contention that has gained prominence in Republican circles starting with the 2000 presidential election, as both political parties have become aggressive in trying to leverage election law into Election Day victories.

~snip~

Glimpses of the role those charges and countercharges have played in firings of at least some of the U.S. attorneys have begun to emerge in recent days. Yesterday, Dan Bartlett, counselor to the president, told reporters accompanying Bush in Mexico that "over the course of several years, we have received complaints about U.S. attorneys, particularly when it comes to election-fraud cases." Bartlett said those complaints have stemmed from New Mexico, where U.S. Attorney David C. Iglesias was fired, as well as Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/13/AR2007031301725.html


more:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/13/AR2007031301725.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. oh so now
Edited on Wed Mar-14-07 06:37 AM by stellanoir
We're truly supposed to believe that they fired prosecutor's who were going after Repuke's who may or may not have been put in office in questionable and compromised elections because the prosecutor's weren't pursuing issues of election fraud.

* parading himself around as a champion of election integrity is enough to make me :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sure, sure, and Colonel Sanders fired his cooks
because they were using chickens in their cooking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. let them hang themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Brand New World Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. And if that's the case, the one in charge of Coulter's region
needs let go too! We haven't seen her ass in jail yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. I got a better explanation.
Carol Lam was starting to investigate Jerry Lewis and other hi-profile Republicans who were tied to the Wilkes corruption case...along with the CIA and Abramoff.

Josh Marshall lays it out here:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/013023.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC