Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We've Got Saddam; Now, Let's Nab Osama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 01:08 PM
Original message
We've Got Saddam; Now, Let's Nab Osama
We've Got Saddam; Now, Let's Nab Osama



http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpuno213592035dec21,0,5345139.story?coll=ny-editorials-headlines
December 21, 2003


Hunting down bin Laden and continuing to pursue an aggressive strategy to root out al-Qaida's cells worldwide must be at the top of Bush's foreign-policy agenda. But those are independent missions, geographically and tactically. They cannot be confused. Success in one does not automatically translate to the other. And the hunt for bin Laden along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border must not divert attention and resources from the plots al-Qaida is hatching in the Middle East and elsewhere.

Bin Laden has intentionally divorced himself from al-Qaida's terror operations and delegated them to loyal subordinates. He remains the iconic figurehead of his radical Islamist movement and the object of cult-like veneration by tens of thousands of disaffected Muslims. But capturing him would not halt al- Qaida's operations. The network no longer depends on his direct leadership; it's designed to operate without central control. And if bin Laden were killed, he would be transformed into a martyr to his movement.


Unlike Hussein, who was feared and despised by a good portion of his subjects and would ultimately be betrayed by one of his cohorts, bin Laden has a fiercely loyal following among the Pakistani tribes among whom he hides. They are devoted to him and believe in his cause. Since bin Laden fled Afghanistan for the safety of Pakistan's rugged northwest frontier, the $25 million price Washington put on his head has had no effect in generating information on his whereabouts.



Complicating all this are indications that al-Qaida is busy shifting funds and operatives away from Afghanistan and into Iraq and its surrounding region - Turkey and Saudi Arabia. The intent is either to turn Iraq into the focus of Islamists' fight against the West or, more ominously, to set a trap by diverting attention to Iraq's insurgency and terror attacks in neighboring nations while al-Qaida is preparing another catastrophic attack against the United States. Either of these moves would dilute resources otherwise devoted to the hunt for bin Laden.

In Iraq, the search for Hussein was integrated into the counterinsurgency operations. Both took place in the Sunni triangle and used the same intelligence and military resources. Capturing bin Laden and defeating al-Qaida pose entirely different and far more daunting challenges. Meeting them will be more essential to the nation's security than defeating Hussein's regime. And success is not an option but a necessity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Better idea... lets send the Kurds after Osama
They seem to have this capture thing down better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Osama will show up when the political timing is right
and he'll have freezer burns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. rofl
You are too too funny, but I totally agree. Look how long it took for the info 'bout Bremmer to come out. It's only the dems in this forum that have the memory of elephants. Thanks to all who keep real issues alive and kicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. which info about Paul (?) Bremer? (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. "info 'bout Bremmer to come out" - Huh?
....and Paul baby only gets one "M" not two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sorry, I didn't make myself clear
Paul Bremer's convoy was supposedly attacked on Dec. 6th and we weren't informed for about ten days. Who knows what's true anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC