Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's Simple: Bush's ProsecutorGate = Nixon's "Saturday Night Massacre"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:27 AM
Original message
It's Simple: Bush's ProsecutorGate = Nixon's "Saturday Night Massacre"
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/6136


It's Simple: Bush's ProsecutorGate = Nixon's "Saturday Night Massacre"
by RJ Eskow | Mar 16 2007 -

The latest rightwing propaganda smokescreen for covering up political misdeeds is this one: Clinton fired Federal prosecutors, too. And they serve at the President's pleasure. The real historical parallel for this scandal isn't Clinton's routine action, however. It's the infamous "Saturday Night Massacre," when Nixon wanted the special prosecutor investigating GOP crimes to be fired. When the Attorney General refused and resigned on principle (remember when Attorneys General had principle?), Nixon fired his successor for refusing and finally got someone who'd do the job for him.

That was the beginning of the end for Nixon's Presidency, and rightfully so. Ethical leaders in both parties were forced to acknowledge the pattern of lawlessness underlying his behavior, and his resignation took place the following year.

That's your analogous situation, folks - not Clinton doing what every President does upon taking office. As has been well reported, every President appoints his own prosecutorial team at the start of his term. That's irrelevant to this scandal. Every new President appoints his own Attorney General and senior Justice Department staff, too. The fact that the Attorney General serves at the President's pleasure didn't make Nixon's actions any more defensible.

The question about the firing of these prosecutors is not what was done, but when it was done - in the middle of a four-year term - and, most importantly why (apparently for refusing to comply with politically-motivated interference with investigations and prosecutions).

The parallel's not exact, of course, in that Nixon was protecting a specific crime with his actions, while these actions were taken for a variety of suspicious reasons. But the irregularity is the same - the unscheduled, mid-term firing of Justice Department officials who refused to permit political tampering with the investigative process.

In other words, motives may have been different in these two cases, but the misdeed is the same.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush, Rove, Gozales and Miers Were Protecting a SLEW of Crime
Because CrooksRUs is all about crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've been calling it "just a third-rate burglary." Irony intended!

:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. next we'll find out that Bush bugged his office...and there are TAPES!
wouldn't that be sweet?
Bush is just about dumb enought to do it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC