Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Accounts of Prosecutors' Dismissals Keep Shifting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:30 AM
Original message
WP: Accounts of Prosecutors' Dismissals Keep Shifting
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 02:34 AM by maddezmom
Accounts of Prosecutors' Dismissals Keep Shifting

By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 17, 2007; Page A01

More than two weeks after a New Mexico U.S. attorney alleged he was fired for not prosecuting Democrats, the White House and the Justice Department are still struggling to explain the roles of President Bush, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and other key officials in the dismissals of eight federal prosecutors last year.

Yesterday, the White House retreated from its four-day-old claim that former counsel Harriet E. Miers started the process two years ago by proposing the firing of all 93 U.S. attorneys.

~snip~

In addition, D. Kyle Sampson, who resigned as Gonzales's chief of staff Monday, disputed the reasons given for his departure in a statement issued through his attorney last night

~snip~

The White House rebuffed demands yesterday from the House and Senate Judiciary committees for more information on the firings, saying the administration needs more time before turning over additional documents or deciding whether to allow key White House officials to testify. The Justice Department announced that it will provide new documents to the committees Monday.

more:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/16/AR2007031601046.html

From the TPMuckraker:

White House to Dems: No Documents for You This Week
By Paul Kiel - March 16, 2007, 4:56 PM
From a release just out from House Judicary Chairman John Conyers (D-MI):

"The White House Counsel's office advised us this afternoon that the White House would not be providing documents to the Committee, or providing the White House's position with respect to the Committee securing the testimony of White House officials today. This is contrary to earlier expectations that the Committee would receive these answers and documents today and is, therefore, very disappointing. The Counsel's office has assured me that they will continue to work in good faith to get answers to those questions by early next week.
Despite those assurances and my continued hope that the White House will resolve these questions in a cooperative fashion, the Committee must take steps to ensure that we are not being stonewalled or slow walked on this matter. I will schedule a vote to issue subpoenas next week for the documents and officials we need to talk to. Allegations that our criminal justice system has been undermined by partisan politics and that the Congress was deceived about these activities are among the most serious this Congress will consider and we expect immediate answers."


From Subcommittee Chair Linda Sanchez (D-CA):

"The White House is playing a dangerous game of chicken. The House Judiciary Committee has been operating in good faith to get to the bottom of this growing scandal, and Chairman Conyers has shown particular restraint in working towards voluntary cooperation."

more:http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002788.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Story shifting = LIES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Everything the WH does now
is less about national security and more about covering up their criminal behavior. If they have done nothing wrong they shouldn't be worried, right? That's what the righties keep telling me when it comes to my personal records, phone and internet use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC