http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/jonas/054Dr. J.'s BF Short Shot: The Significance of Ann Coulter
Submitted by BuzzFlash on Mon, 03/19/2007 - 10:19am. Steven Jonas
Ann Coulter is not a joke. She is not perceptive. She offers no new insights, even from the Right. She is not irrelevant. She is not far out. She is not crazy. She is not brainless (indeed she may be very smart but that is hard to ascertain from a distance and through her public persona). She is not to be ignored. Nor is she to be shut up, as the Human Rights Campaign would like to do.
Ann Coulter is in fact very significant. Ann Coulter is the face of the modern Republican Party. Most readers of BuzzFlash are aware of her remark when she implied that John Edwards is gay. Whether or not he is should not be a matter for public discussion. (It is highly unlikely that he is, but hey, you never know.) But Ann Coulter wanted to make it so for two reasons. First, John Edwards has taken, in the contemporary Democratic Party sense, left-wing positions on most issues other than the future of Israel/Palestine. Second, John Edwards has a real chance to win the Democratic nomination, and with Barack Obama as his running mate would present a formidable obstacle to Republican retention of the White House short of a declaration of martial law by CheneyBush for some "national emergency" that would oh-so-conveniently occur say in mid-October 2008, and suspension of the election (a distinct possibility). So, what to do, for someone like Coulter?
Discuss the Bush record? Present a program for solving the nation's major problems? Get out of Iraq? Hardly. Change the subject, a favorite tactic of the modern Republican Party. Take control of the agenda, the favorite tactic of Karl Rove. Ignore Edwards on the issues, but get people talking about whether he is gay, where Coulter got her info, Coulter's outrageousness, and Ann Coulter herself. The HRC's call for a boycott and eventual ban plays right into her hands. The discussion additionally becomes "free speech", etc. So what should be done?
Ann Coulter should be draped around the necks of the Republican Party. When she made her "faggot" remark to the Republican core, the "Conservative" Political Action Committee, the audience actually laughed. This is where these people are and this is where they would like our country to be. That's the point we have to make over and over again. Homophobia is a major political weapon for the Republicans (just like it was of the Nazis). This is a divisive, destructive, and irrelevant issue, designed only to create hate and distract the American people from what that party is doing to our country. The "Three D's" are what the Republicans are all about: Distract, Divide, and Destroy. We should be taking Coulter and Hannity and Limbaugh and all the rest of them and say: "This is the Republican Party. As long as they are in charge, ‘liberal' or no, ‘anti-war' or no, this is what our country will look like not-too-far down the road." America is better than this, than them, oh-so-much better. Let's stop being defensive about Coulter. Let's go beyond her and hammer the Republican Party over its head with her.
Steven Jonas, MD, MPH is a Professor of Preventive Medicine at Stony Brook University (NY), a weekly contributing author for The Political Junkies, and contributing editor for The Moving Planet Blog.