Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: Capture of British sailors is all too familiar, rules of engagement at issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:49 AM
Original message
LAT: Capture of British sailors is all too familiar, rules of engagement at issue
Capture of British sailors is all too familiar
Iran also seized three servicemen in 2004, but this time raises added alarm.
By Kim Murphy, Times Staff Writer
March 25, 2007


LONDON — A disconcerting sense of deja vu surrounds Iran's capture of 15 British sailors and marines on smuggling patrol Friday in the Persian Gulf.

Three years ago, eight British servicemen traveling in small boats up the Shatt al Arab waterway near the Iranian border with Iraq found themselves surrounded by members of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard, arrested and subjected to a three-day ordeal that included mock executions and a visit to what they thought would be their graves. After a few days, they were released.

The previous incident raises concerns here over what the captured sailors and marines may be going through, and has also raised questions about the rules of engagement that do not allow British military officers on smuggling patrol in the Persian Gulf to return fire when confronted, a former senior navy official said Saturday.

"I think if we're going to be operating in those waters and something like this happens, we have to think very carefully about, rather than being de-escalatory, stepping back and turning the other cheek, whether we should be responding in some different way," Alan West, who commanded the British navy during the June 2004 incident, said in a telephone interview.

more:http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-fg-brits25mar25,1,2114727.story?coll=la-news-a_section
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Easy solution...............don't smuggle!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don't know what they were trying to smuggle since I can't read the article. But doesn't the word smuggle, imply that it is illegal?

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Brits weren't smuggling
They were on patrol checking for smugglers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC