Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tapping into privacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 08:56 PM
Original message
Tapping into privacy
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 09:12 PM by babylonsister
http://www.sptimes.com/2007/03/25/Opinion/Tapping_into_privacy.shtml

Tapping into privacy

We're being snooped on without proper oversight, and it is time to start caring about the law and our right to privacy again.

By ROBYN BLUMNER
Published March 25, 2007

It just goes to show you what six years of this administration has done to our national psyche. After the torture memos, "state-secrets" defenses, the demise of habeas corpus and secret overseas prisons, what's a little invasion of privacy?

If Attorney General Alberto Gonzales doesn't lose his job due to the bombshell report from Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine, finding that the FBI flagrantly disregarded express limits on its snooping abilities, then we have become completely inured to the Bush administration's outrages.

Part of me feels sorry for the schmoes that President Bush has surrounded himself with, people like hapless Harriet Miers, his former White House counsel and the lapdog Gonzales. The attorney general has had some of the top legal jobs in the nation, including a stint on the Texas Supreme Court, because his pal George kept pulling him along. But Gonzales is not a sophisticated legal thinker. He is a loyal, partisan, sycophantic hack.

On the Charlie Rose Show in June 2005, Gonzales was promoting the reauthorization of the USA Patriot Act. Some of its provisions were set to expire at the end of that year and there were plenty of critics, including myself, saying that the act had gone too far in trenching on civil liberties.

Gonzales told viewers "if you look honestly at the facts, one must conclude ... that the act has not been used to infringe upon civil liberties."

Now, thanks to Inspector General Fine's findings, we know the honest facts.

From 2003 to 2005, the act was used as cover to violate the privacy of potentially thousands of people in this country. Gonzales' assurances were as empty as were his confirmation hearing claims that he would act independently of the White House.

more...

New NYT article on IG Fine here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3181424&mesg_id=3181424
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. And if anyone thinks there was no politically motivated snooping...
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 09:08 PM by yourout
I have some prime real-estate they might be interested in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC