Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq Gone Mad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 09:52 AM
Original message
Iraq Gone Mad
http://villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/archive/2007/04/iraq_gone_mad.php

<snip>

posted: 8:38 AM, April 15, 2007 by Harkavy



Welcome to the Green Zone! A typical scene after a homemade bomb exploded at Gate 3 of Baghdad's most heavily fortified area.



Is it official yet? Can we finally call what's going on in Iraq a civil war?

Sunnis and Shiites (and their various factions) have been blowing each other up for some time now, and many people have called this a civil war for quite a while.

Now, thanks to Ned Parker's report in this morning's Los Angeles Times, we have proof:

Suspicious of Iraq's CIA-funded national intelligence agency, members of the Iraqi government have erected a "shadow" secret service that critics say is driven by a Shiite Muslim agenda and has left the country with dueling spy agencies.
Parker notes that the CIA funds the government's official spy agency, INIS. That's run by Sunnis. Now there's a Shiite agency that's spying, no doubt, on the spies. What a Mad situation (apologies to Cold War chronicler Antonio Prohías).

Is this a surprise? No. As I pointed out in May 2005, "Iraq's developing civil war couldn't have surprised the Pentagon." That's because the War Department's own James A. Russell pointed it out in June 2002 in the excellent journal Strategic Insights, published by the Naval Postgraduate School's Center for Contemporary Conflict, based in Monterey, California. Russell's piece, "Shibboleth Slaying in a Post-Saddam Iraq," noted:

The makeup of Iraq makes it difficult to envision anything but a Sunni-led minority ruling through coercion and force. So if not Saddam, then who and what? Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds present contending histories and circumstances that limit their ability to cooperate in a more representative form of democratic government. Each of these groups has more of an interest in governing themselves than in cooperating with each other.
-MORE-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. That picture looks like Bush's Iraq plan
If there ever was one in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC