Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hired Gun at the Helm: Justice Unhinged

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 06:04 PM
Original message
Hired Gun at the Helm: Justice Unhinged
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17565.htm

Hired Gun at the Helm: Justice Unhinged

By William A. Cohn

04/20/07 "ICH " -- - -As US attorney general (AG) Alberto Gonzales testifies before Congress this week, let’s understand the reasons why the dismissal of 8 well-respected US attorneys is a matter of grave public concern. The facts revealed thus far certainly suggest that the executive branch has intruded on the independence of the federal judiciary, partisan politics has subverted the rule of law at the Department of Justice, and, as a result, the legitimacy of the enforcement of federal law has been soiled.

The 93 US attorneys wield enormous power – to subpoena, indict, imprison, prosecute and possibly convict any person. They are indeed political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the President. But once in office impartiality is their core legal and ethical duty. A prosecutor must always address a case on its merits, and never with a political agenda. The facts which have come to light in recent weeks suggest that the 8 US attorneys were fired for being loyal to their oath of office rather than the White House, which raises obvious concerns about the 85 US attorneys still serving.

The AG is the chief law enforcement official of the country and head of the Dept. of Justice where the US attorneys work. An AG should embody the values of truth, integrity and justice, and serve as the gatekeeper of propriety, setting clear standards of conduct for the politicians as well as ordinary people. But Mr. Gonzales has utterly failed his duty and must now surely take the fall for the travesty of justice he hath wrought.

Why has this AG so violated the duties of his office? Because he’s acted as a hired gun, not a public servant. Mr. Gonzales’ public career has developed through his loyal service to G.W. Bush. When he became AG after serving as special counsel to the President, his client changed but his mindset and loyalties haven’t. The AG’s client is the people of the country and their Constitution and laws, not the President or his political party. Mr. Gonzales has had a clear conflict of interest because his loyalties to serving his former client, G.W. Bush, have absolutely interfered with fulfilling his duties as AG.

It seems the US attorneys faced political pressures to prosecute high-profile Democrats, not to bring charges against Republicans, to charge immigration violations and to bring indictments and win convictions on charges of voter fraud based on evidence which one appellate judge described as “beyond thin.” Such misconduct both destroys the lives of innocent people and lets criminality go unpunished. These intrusions on the independence of the federal prosecutors were made in order to hold on to power by gaining a partisan edge in national elections by means of an electoral strategy aimed at keeping Blacks and Hispanics away from the polls.

Although we do not yet know exactly what role, if any, the AG played, such no holds barred results-oriented conduct is wholly consistent with the record of Mr. Gonzales’ service as White House Counsel, where he provided legal cover for wrongheaded administration policies including torture, abductions, secret prisons and warrantless spying on US citizens. The patently pretextual reasons proffered for the firings suggest that the real reason is indeed impermissible. Here, the power grab by the executive branch involved using a little-noticed provision inserted into the renewed Patriot Act, allowing US attorneys to be appointed without need for Senate confirmation, which it intended to use to replace the respected US attorney in Arkansas, Bud Cummins, with Timothy Griffen, aide to Bush chief strategist Karl Rove, who lacks ample prosecutorial experience. Fortunately, the Senate woke up recently and revoked this provision which fundamentally altered the constitutional separation of powers.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where the loyalty of the 85 rests, their oath or the WH, will be known by their works
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC