Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: The Right Thing, at Last (Ashcroft recusal and special prosecutor)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 01:01 AM
Original message
NYT: The Right Thing, at Last (Ashcroft recusal and special prosecutor)
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/31/opinion/31WED1.html

After an egregiously long delay, Attorney General John Ashcroft finally did the right thing yesterday when he recused himself from the investigation into who gave the name of a C.I.A. operative to the columnist Robert Novak. Mr. Ashcroft turned the inquiry over to his deputy, who quickly appointed a special counsel. There was little chance of a credible outcome for the investigation as Mr. Ashcroft had originally chosen to run it: under his personal supervision, using Justice Department lawyers whose futures are dependent on his good graces. Even the normal investigative units of the F.B.I. would have been cut out of the loop.

<snip>

There are still serious questions about the investigation, the most immediate of which is whether Mr. Comey will give Mr. Fitzgerald true operational independence. Mr. Comey must also allow Mr. Fitzgerald to use the full powers of a special counsel, including the ability to seek Congressional intervention if he finds his investigation blocked by a government official or agency.

We may never know what damage was caused by Mr. Ashcroft's delay of nearly two months in taking the proper action. Further time will now be lost as Mr. Fitzgerald gets up to speed on the investigation. In his announcement, Mr. Comey said that Mr. Ashcroft was displaying "an abundance of caution" in recusing himself from the case. But that sort of care would have mandated the appointment of a special counsel from the start. Yesterday's developments left open the possibility of what we feared all along: that Mr. Ashcroft's extremely tight political bonds with President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Karl Rove, the chief White House strategist, inevitably conflicted with an investigation into whether someone at the White House, perhaps acting with institutional sanction, had revealed the name of a C.I.A. operative for political reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. But Fox Pundits already put out the word...
the reason Fitzgerald, an outstanding and successful lawyer, was chosen is that 'there's nothing there to be found.' To protect Asscrap, Fitzgerald will be credible when he announces to the world that 'I found nothing, there's nothing there..case closed.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Have you read Fitzgerald's biography? He has taken down some
pretty big fish. I wouldn't imagine he is easily intimidated.
I disagree with your assessment at this point and time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm starting to feel like this really may go somewhere. Josh Marshall
at TPM has a good post on the subject. He rightly points out that Ashcroft isn't just doing the right thing and that something has probably happened. But what? If you operate under the premise that
the person or event that has been identified is so close to Ashcroft that he couldn't do anything but recuse himself then all signs point to Cheney or Rove. Scooter seems far enough removed that Ashcroft wouldn't have felt the need to make a move. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoVet Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Don't discount the CIA
It may be that they dropped a few cards on the table in front of Johnny Boy, just enough to let him know what else might be lurking in the deck. He's an ideologue and a neocon but he's no dummy, and he's not taking a fall for anyone, even Junior, who I don't think he has much loyalty to anyway. For Holy John, Junior is just the means to an end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree.
I think the CIA is pretty pissed and threatened to make some nasty leaks about Iraq or something along that lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mecil Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Or maybe the CIA has some info on their sexual preference:o)
Or maybe the CIA has some info on their sexual preference, not uncommon for intelligence agencies to keep tabs on sexual habits of leaders. Just to pressure them when the right time comes. Maybe some of the spooks came by and said, either you guys own up to this, or we let the world that you're like Wacko-Jacko on crack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Too Little, Too Late
All the bodies have been buried by now. Unless Novak is subject to the kind of treatments the folks in Guantanamo are getting....

Sigh. A girl can dream, can't she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC