Well, I've gotten a bit behind on my Entertainment Weekly magazines. (Its one of my guilty pleasures, has been for about 14 years now...)
ANYWAY, there was a sidebar in the June 1st issue that made me just furious.
In the article titled "Ready for Moore", there is a sidebar called "Don't Pack Up for France Just Yet", and the byline reads: "Want a more balanced look at U.S. health care? We dreamt up six scenes to add to 'Sicko.' - Daniel Gross" (The internet line reads: "The Upside of Michael Moore's health-care gripe -- EW explores angles the director didn't")
Then it goes on to list 6 examples of how US healthcare is so great.
What strikes me, though, is that most of the examples don't prove anything great about US healthcare. They seem to prove that because of the FAILINGS of US healthcare, states and private companies have stepped up.
And what strikes me even more is that this was printed.
What in the hell is a healthcare industry apologist article doing in an entertainment magazine?
And why for this article, and this article alone?
There are plenty of other articles. They include Internet-only trailers (red bar, R-rated trailers), with no corresponding sidebar titled "Want a more balanced look at the movie industry - here are this year's PG rated trailers." An article about what TV networks are doing wrong, but no corresponding "Wanna Feel Better About TV?" sidebar.
I know that EW is owned by Time Warner, but I can't imagine that they paid for this. But why is it here? Doesn't it seem wildly misplaced?
Regardless, here's the article:
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20040164,00.html Don't know if you need a password or not. If so, I'll try to post the whole thing in a reply.