Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush administration attacks 'shield' for bloggers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:30 PM
Original message
Bush administration attacks 'shield' for bloggers
more: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6191053.html?tag=st.util.print

Bush administration attacks 'shield' for bloggers

By Anne Broache
http://news.com.com/Bush+administration+attacks+shield+for+bloggers/2100-1028_3-6191053.html

Story last modified Thu Jun 14 13:52:58 PDT 2007


WASHINGTON--The Bush administration on Thursday blasted a congressional proposal that would shield a broad swath of news gatherers, including some bloggers, from revealing their confidential sources.

The latest draft of the Free Flow of Information Act would pose a grave threat to national security and federal criminal investigations by protecting far too large a segment of the population, a U.S. Department of Justice official told Congress.


A correction was made to this story. Read below for details.

"The definition is just so broad that it really includes anyone who wants to post something to the Web," Rachel Brand, assistant attorney general in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy, said at a House Judiciary Committee hearing here. She also argued it would protect "a terrorist operative who videotaped a message from a terrorist leader threatening attacks on Americans."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bring it on, moron, you can't arrest us all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tough shit, Little Lord Pissypants.
Explain to us how it's ok for your minions to perpetually lie every f*cking day of the week on every MSM channel that will carry it. Life's a bitch. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. beautifully said, Fooj, may I just add
how is that your minions show contempt for the rule of law and the US Constitution but the barest fig leaf of legal protection
for those with differing political opinion is not tolerated? This is a democracy, and like it or not, you are ALL public servants
and are subject to more restrictions that we the bloggers, also known as We, the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hi Miss Waverly!
Nice to see you!:hi:

The ReTHUGlicans are pathetic little whiners.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I am looking for them to have a makeover party
come up with a new party logo, new clothes, toupees, the works, and of course a clean image, the latest that money can buy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't know if they can.
Junior seems to have a real fascination with the Presidential Seal. Look at his socks! LOL!!! It looks like Laura shops for him at the kiddie store.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. he's definitely the 'work casual' president
the only thing I remember Johnson and Nixon wearing were suits and ties, I guess that's because they had a full-time job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another bizarre statement by a Bushie
"She also argued it would protect "a terrorist operative who videotaped a message from a terrorist leader threatening attacks on Americans."


LOL! Like they have ever caught any of the folks that routinely post scary video messages on alleged "terrorist" web sites. It has always fascinated me that the NSA can log each and every word I utter in a telephone conversation as well each word I send in an email, but they are not able to catch the senders of the video to web sites in the Middle East allegedly from terrorists. What is up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. right!! like this stuff isn't all over web 24/7--idiot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Does Anthrax Ring a Bell?
Lately we've seen that this cabal can't even find its ass with two hands and a map. Guess it needs a teleprompter....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divide Et Impera Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Transparency....
It's a one way street.





I wonder if bloggers can cite Executive Privilege....

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC