Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Missing the Point on Distrust of Bush Administration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Bennet Kelley Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:33 AM
Original message
Missing the Point on Distrust of Bush Administration
From the Santa Monica Daily Press

Missing the Point on Distrust of Bush Administration


LOS ANGELES TIMES COLUMNIST JONAH GOLDBERG RANTS that the Democrats are "out of their gourds", "delusional" and have gone beyond "blame America first," based on a recent Rasmussen poll that found that 35 percent of Democrats believed that President Bush "knew about the 9/11 attacks in advance" and another 26 percent were unsure. Goldberg's conclusion that Democrats have a "serious problem" misses the point entirely. When 61 percent of Democrats and 44 percent of the total sample are unable to dismiss such a proposition, it is the Republicans who have a "serious problem."

The Rasmussen poll is not an aberration since it is one of many polls documenting the public's growing mistrust of the Bush administration, which, according to John Dean, has made mendacity public policy. For example, a February ABC News/Washington Post poll reported that 63 percent of Americans do not trust the Bush Administration to honestly and accurately report intelligence about possible threats from other countries. Similarly, a 2006 CBS Poll found that 20 percent of Americans thought that the Bush administration was never or hardly ever truthful and even one fifth of Republicans believed that this administration told the truth "only some of the time."

Nonetheless, to conclude or even suspect that the administration would have been complicit in 9/11 requires more than mistrust, but evidence of or belief that the administrationwould sacrifice the national interest for its own. The outing of Valerie Plame is a perfect example of this behavior, as is the fact that when Dick Cheney was president of Halliburton and Condoleezza Rice sat on Chevron's board and led its public policy committee, both companies paid kickbacks to Saddam Hussein.

In addition, from Michael Brown being appointed to head FEMA to Cheney's infamous remark that the 2002 election results meant that they could pursue tax cuts despite their impact on the deficit since it was "their due," this administration has repeatedly been defined by its cronyism and catering to big business at the expense of working Americans. This has meant blocking efforts to close off-shore tax loopholes, shifting the cost of cleaning up waste sites from the polluters to taxpayers, eliminating "responsible contractor" rules requiring agencies to take into account "violations of labor, employment, environmental or consumer protection laws" and showering cronies with government contracts by increasing contracting to record levels and doubling the number of no-bid awards.

When this behavior is considered in the context of the administration's infringement of civil liberties, unprecedented signing statements and refusal to acknowledge limitations on its powers, along with lingering questions about whether the 2000, 2002 or 2004 elections were rigged -- it is easy to understand the widespread distrust.

Finally, there is the question of motive. Conspiracy theorists usually combine the neo-con manifesto published by the Project for a New American Century (signed by Dick Cheney, Scooter Libby, Jeb Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and others ) which noted how a Pearl Harbor-like event could galvanize the public to support their agenda and the administration's total failure to heed pre-September 11 warnings to make their case. While these theories have some holes and are somewhat fanciful, four years into a war launched by 237 lies and misstatements (according to a Congressional study), these theories are far more reality based than this administration's ignoring all scientific data on global warming.

There is no doubt that it is sad to think that so many would view this administration as capable of such treachery. This is not a question of "blame America first," as Goldberg contends, since this theory is not based on any inherent flaw in the American character or system of government,but on this particular administration's repeated decisions to benefit the few at the expense of the many and lie whenever it is convenient to do so.

I can only imagine that had Goldberg covered the Exxon Valdez incident he would have ignored Exxon's role and instead blamed the seals for swimming in the polluted waters since, in this case, Goldberg's rant fails to acknowledge how the Bush administration's actions have polluted the political landscape. The reality is not that Democrats have "lost their gourd," but that Republicans have lost the faith and trust of the American people.

As Sophocles noted long ago: When trust dies, mistrust blossoms. This administration has done everything possible to deliver a bountiful harvest.

Bennet Kelley is the former Co-Founder and National Co-Chair of the Democratic National Committee's Saxophone Club (its young professional fundraising and outreach arm in the Clinton years); a columnist with the Santa Monica Daily Press, contributing author to Big Bush Lies, publisher of BushLies.net and an internet attorney living in Santa Monica.

Bennet’s work on Democratic Underground has been recognized by the Los Angeles Press Club which named him as a finalist in Online Commentary for the 2007 Southern California Journalism Awards (for which he won Second Prize in 2006).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Them GOP PUBs are soon gonna have withdrawal "Shakes" when kept from their POWER trips
Intoxicating...the sheer Power they have enjoyed for years have made them wanting a return to the majority.....

Now they see Bush as a Liability and an anchor around the Pub Partys neck...
Bush is now viewed as IN THE WAY.....The PUB Base is Fearful of a GOP BackLash....Due to Bushies Failure to produch 1 friggen touchdown in 6 years. Bush is making the GOP look like shit......


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well of course the bushes knew about the 9/11 attacks.
They were warned over fifty different times by domestic investigators to foreign intelligence agencies. Their refusal to do anything before it happened is criminal negligence at a minimum. But of course the corporate media paints them bushes as strong on defense. Come on, they couldn't or wouldn't stop 9/11 even when they knew it was going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Seriously...
it's well documented that * knew in advance. I wonder why the liberal media doesn't include that point as background in every article on 9/11? Oh, right, there is no liberal media.

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Please Don't Confuse Them With the Facts
It's difficult to clean up exploded brains--not even cold water, bleach or lye will take it out of fabrics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. BushCo positively counts on Amerkins unwillingness to believe....
in conspiracy. I'm not even going to use the word theory here. Just as with the Kennedy assassination and the magic bullet, 9/11 has far too many inconsistencies and even downright facts to the contrary to make the "official" stories work. BushCo's unbridled hubris is supported in part by the knowledge that most Amerkins will squelch any and all conspiracy talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mistrust in the government is part of their Plan
Drown it in the bath tub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well said
There are many people who are simply unwilling that the leaders of their own country could even contemplate such a thing. Those people either have very little knowledge of history or of this administration, or they are simply in denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. "a war based on 237 lies" - what a stunning comment
I would love to see these 237 spelled out. I understand that if you're a conservative -- social, fiscal, whatever -- you're likely going to prefer a Rethug over a Dem, but I am still amazed that even 30% of the population specifically consider Chimpy to be some sort of heroic figure. I wonder how many of them say that when the pollsters call but are secretly ashamed that they have enabled this piece of corn shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bennet Kelley speaks for me K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Goldberg's dismissal of 9/11 skeptics
is based on authoritarian GOP views instead of independent research. He probably hasn't read a single book (even non conspiracy) on 9/11. For some reason Goldberg wants the public to buy the notion that lockstep obedience to corrupt leaders=patriotism. Of course it's always enjoyable to be lectured by people who don't know WTF they are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kicking b/c the time limit is up for recommending. Sorry I didn't
see this sooner....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larry Ogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. It is no fun being out of your gourd and delusional, but after considering the option
of running around with your head up your ass all day, and the consequences of believing that fascist unelected knuckle dragging Neanderthal occupying the White House, the choice is quite clear…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. NASA's investigation into the Columbia accident began immediately
It took a year before anything was done concerning 9-11, and only when it was clear the issue wouldn't go away did * take action. Even so, he stacked the deck, even going so far as to first appoint Henry Kissinger as the chairman of the commission. In the end the commission was underfunded, given an unrealistic time to investigate, lied to by the Pentagon, refused testimony by key administation officials (Condi's appearance was a joke), and the WH refused or delayed producing essential documents.

The fact that the final report totally ignores the collapse of WTC 7 speaks volumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC