|
Edited on Wed Jan-07-04 09:01 PM by WillyBrandt
Terrible: I used to defend this rag, since sometimes they run worthy articles (on arts, sometimes on politics, etc.) No more: it sucks.
It's at www.tnr.com
(Joe's ugly mug smack in the center)
Quoth:
"The deep irony of Lieberman's campaign is that many Democrats view him as timid. But how much courage does it take for Dean to throw red meat to the party faithful? The Democratic Party is racing back to the '80s, with interest groups enforcing litmus tests on everything from partial-birth abortion to steel tariffs, and party activists dangerously out of touch with a country that feels threatened by terrorism, not Donald Rumsfeld."
Missing the point entirely. It takes bravery to stand up to pro-war, pro-Bush propaganda, to a right-wing media. It takes bravery to not cower before the Right, to be proud to be a Democrat--to proclaim it as such. The candidate is supposed to be willing to challenge us, sure, but he cannot only do that: HE MUST BE OUR CHAMPION. Clinton, whatever his faults, wasn't always a champion of the liberal faction of the party--but he was the party's champion.
Clark is a new Democrat, and he would be a champion of our party. Likewise Dean. Likewise Edwards, Sharpton, Kucinich, Edwards, Braun, Gephardt.
Joe Lieberman is no one's champion. Except, perhaps, for The New Republic.
(In fairness, the other pro-other-candidate articles are basically quite good. The pro-Dean one is especially good; Johnathan Cohn is a very good writer. Those are worth checking out)
|