http://business-times.asia1.com.sg/story/0,4567,106084,00.html(LOS ANGELES) AS THE general election process begins in the United States, it is useful to consider whether the world's only superpower, so eager to impose democracy on Iraq, should first reform its own troubled electoral institutions.
The first event in that process - Tuesday's unexpected results in the Iowa caucuses to choose a Democratic presidential candidate - provided modest excitement. Yet the US media's suggestion that the people had spoken in a powerful display of democracy was not just exaggerated, but untrue.
The Iowa caucuses, a leftover from the 18th century in which nobody actually votes, are so complicated they are impossible to describe. Volunteer organisers needed calculators to configure the delegate ratios as registered Democrats stood in groups under notices naming their choice among the five candidates (three did not bother to compete).
These good Iowans, who braved temperatures of minus 17C and sacrificed their evening for the meetings, were double the participants in 2000, the media trumpeted. Unmentioned was that even this year, the total was a measly 15 per cent of the mid-Western state's registered Democrats - a meaningless number for any guide to the eventual nominee.
more...