Romney and Huckabee's religious intolerance (Joe Conason)

[trogdor]

http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2007/12/07/religion_presidency/

In this op/ed piece, Joe Conason puts the smackdown on religious intolerance, who is more prone to practice it, and why we should be gravely concerned about electing people who would insist that "freedom requires religion," among other things.

Dec. 7, 2007 | Distasteful as all the Bible thumping and ostentatious piety of the Republican presidential aspirants certainly are, the time may have come to address their religious pretensions directly, instead of turning away in mild disgust. For the truth is that no matter how often candidates like Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee promise to uphold the Constitution and protect religious freedom, they are clearly seeking to impose the restrictive tests of faith that the nation's founders abhorred.

The most egregious offender against basic American civics today is Huckabee, who told a group of students at Liberty University, the center of higher learning founded by the late Jerry Falwell, that his sudden rise in the Iowa polls is an act of God. He compared the improvement in his political fortunes to the New Testament miracle of the loaves and fishes. He wasn't joking, as both his demeanor and his words demonstrated.

The Rev. Huckabee has proved willing to risk his oversold reputation as the "nice" evangelical with a primary strategy that draws attention to his qualifications as a "Christian leader," in contrast to the suspect Mormonism of Romney. Huckabee was honest enough not to deny that he believes the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is a cult -- and in fact, many if not most of his fellow Southern Baptists regard the LDS church as a satanic cult.

In response, Romney delivered an address that simultaneously pleaded for religious tolerance and urged intolerance of what he termed the "religion of secularism." The former Massachusetts governor at once declined to discuss the specific dogmas of his own faith while seeking to convince the bigots in his political party that, like them, he accepts Jesus Christ as the Son of God and his Savior. (Actually, Mormon beliefs about Jesus, which Romney insists he will not abandon, are considerably more complicated than his speech implied and bear little resemblance to the theology of orthodox Christianity.)
--clip--

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

1. One of those rw preachers put out a book called Cults

and yes, the LDS Church was in there, as were the Unitarians, Unity, and most Eastern Religions. I was sort of miffed when my Sufi Order wasn't mentioned. :) But the point is, these people have a very limited view of what is ok and what is not, religion-wise. Right now we have a pResident who pretends to be fundamentalist--if we get in one who really is, we're in deep trouble, for I have no doubt they will do their best to make this nation into a theocracy.