Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Buck Stops With CIA, Not Administration - Helen Thomas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:55 AM
Original message
Buck Stops With CIA, Not Administration - Helen Thomas
Buck Stops With CIA, Not Administration
Agency Outraged At David Kay's Recent 'Premature' Assessment

POSTED: 6:37 p.m. EST January 30, 2004

WASHINGTON -- The nation's capital is still reeling from the firestorm set off by retired weapons inspector David A. Kay after he fingered faulty U.S. intelligence for the now-discredited White House claim that Saddam Hussein had large stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction.

His targeted culprit, the CIA, is outraged over the Kay attack.

President Bush told reporters that he wants to know "the facts" about intelligence failures concerning Saddam's alleged arsenal but he's not curious enough to endorse an independent commission inquiry that Kay recommended. Instead, Bush said he wants the weapons hunters to keep looking.

Condoleeza Rice, the president's national security adviser, wants us to move on. It doesn't matter if there were no weapons, she says.

more....................

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/helenthomas/2807748/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. It doesn't matter? It doesn't matter?
Dr. Rice is full of it. The whole point of going to war was the WMDs. The fact that she now says it doesn't matter just proves the point that they were merely an excuse for the neocons to do what they wanted to do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. are her comments ludicrous - or what?
from the Thomas piece:
In a damage-control move, national security affairs adviser Rice made the rounds of the television networks in an effort to blunt Kay's electrifying charges. Rice has invented a way to push the missing WMD aside. She says it doesn't matter whether Saddam Hussein had those weapons.

Instead, she argues that Bush "had no choice but to deal with that gathering threat to American interests and to the interests of our friends abroad."


Okay - the weapons didn't matter... but saddam was a gathering threat... er without the weapons... without an act of aggression since putting down the US inspired rebellion just after the GulfWar I... with no connection to alqeada... if it wasn't the touted wmds.. what was the "gathering threat"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC