Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman: The Real Man

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:42 AM
Original message
Krugman: The Real Man
To understand why questions about George Bush's time in the National Guard are legitimate, all you have to do is look at the federal budget published last week. No, not the lies, damned lies and statistics — the pictures.

By my count, this year's budget contains 27 glossy photos of Mr. Bush. We see the president in front of a giant American flag, in front of the Washington Monument, comforting an elderly woman in a wheelchair, helping a small child with his reading assignment, building a trail through the wilderness and, of course, eating turkey with the troops in Iraq. Somehow the art director neglected to include a photo of the president swimming across the Yangtze River.
...
Some of his critics hope that the AWOL issue will demolish the Bush myth, all at once. They're probably too optimistic — if it were that easy, the tale of Harken Energy would have already done the trick. The sad truth is that people who have been taken in by a cult of personality — a group that in this case includes a good fraction of the American people, and a considerably higher fraction of the punditocracy — are very reluctant to give up their illusions. If nothing else, that would mean admitting that they had been played for fools.

Still, we may be on our way to an election in which Mr. Bush is judged on his record, not his legend. And that, of course, is what the White House fears.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/13/opinion/13KRUG.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting this, if only the sheeple actually read the NYT
we would be in a lot better shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Centre_Left Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Actually...
If the "sheeple" were as stunningly brilliant and well-read as you, why would we need a government at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Hi Centre_Left!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sobering thoughts

Some of his critics hope that the AWOL issue will demolish the Bush myth, all at once. They're probably too optimistic — if it were that easy, the tale of Harken Energy would have already done the trick. The sad truth is that people who have been taken in by a cult of personality — a group that in this case includes a good fraction of the American people, and a considerably higher fraction of the punditocracy — are very reluctant to give up their illusions. If nothing else, that would mean admitting that they had been played for fools.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wabeewoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. I hope the congress wakes up and questions....
"In fact, those 27 photos grace one of the four most dishonest budgets in the nation's history — the other three are the budgets released in 2001, 2002 and 2003. Just to give you a taste: remember how last year's budget contained no money for postwar Iraq — and how administration officials waited until after the tax cut had been passed to mention the small matter of $87 billion in extra costs? Well, they've done it again: earlier this week the Army's chief of staff testified that the Iraq funds in the budget would cover expenses only through September"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Krugman is pointing out an attempt at a totalitarian like
cult of personality (like Maoism) with this perfect one sentence gem.

Somehow the art director neglected to include a photo of the president swimming across the Yangtze River.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I loved that too.
Very clear parallel to Mao. And perhaps one can't help but be reminded of some other leaders with personality cults--Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong-il. Nice.

Also, the use of the word "cult" below may be part of a trend. Lou Dobbs accused the RW-bot, James Glassman, of being part of a cult last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. here is a great sentence
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 08:56 AM by ixion
In fact, those 27 photos grace one of the four most dishonest budgets in the nation's history — the other three are the budgets released in 2001, 2002 and 2003.

Got a wry chuckle out of that one.

Go, Paul, Go!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. ROFL!
"Somehow the art director neglected to include a photo of the president swimming across the Yangtze River."

Mao Tse-Dubya! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Withering exposure
It's just too bad his fellow journalists have become inured to Krugman. This article alone should make them all squirm on the hot seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. The greatest bumper sticker ever
Politicians and diapers need to be changed -for the same reason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. "he has forfeited any right to cite his character " AMEN Paul...AMEN
regarding: "...I do think he has forfeited any right to cite his character to turn away charges that his administration is lying about its policies."

I could not agree more and I think that this development more than any flightsuit photo op stunt, will be the thing that forces Americans to take a long, hard and deep look at this President.

Let's hope I am right.

Thank you Paul Krugman for your spirited defense of our democracy and this great nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. great line: Bush has "forfeited any right to cite his character"
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/13/opinion/13KRUG.html


The Real Man
Paul Krugman

<snip>There is, as far as I can tell, no positive evidence that Mr. Bush is a man of exceptional uprightness. When has he even accepted responsibility for something that went wrong? On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence that he is willing to cut corners when it's to his personal advantage. His business career was full of questionable deals, and whatever the full truth about his National Guard service, it was certainly not glorious.

<snip>I don't know what he's hiding. But I do think he has forfeited any right to cite his character to turn away charges that his administration is lying about its policies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC