|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
![]() |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 08:53 AM Original message |
Krugman - Fannie, Freddie can't be allowed to fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. It was the deregulation of banking started by reagan and finalized by Clinton that did this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar
![]() |
Tue Jul-15-08 08:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
17. You put in Clinton and left out both Bushes? Under Clinton the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Tue Jul-15-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Agreed /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. Krugman is often very wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:04 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. It was under greenspan where they removed food and energy in determining inflation /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:23 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Headline inflation still includes food and energy. They just ignore it for policy decisions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Look at almost every angry article he wrote during the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. If you are comfortable with collapses that would deepen the recession dramatically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 10:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. The rate cuts weren't intrinsically bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
4. Krugman is trying to pacify the left. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Failure would mean a disaster of proportions not seen since the 1930s. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:26 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. And what problem is the solution going to create? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:38 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I'd rather deal with that than having firms with $1.5 trillion in bonds default. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:57 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Unless the consequence is worth 3 trillion in defaults next time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:30 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I'm not advocating collapse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:40 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Part of the Reaganomics model is privatizing healthy companies and socializing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats_win
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
15. Intersting article. Who pays for these failed banks or will we borrow that money too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer
![]() |
Tue Jul-15-08 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
16. At least their debt is backed by collateral; that is, they hold the mortgages, so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliss
![]() |
Tue Jul-15-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
19. Re: Too big to fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester
![]() |
Tue Jul-15-08 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
20. I'm just curious to know how many millions their "havemore" CEOs and ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC