Dissent Voiceby Tom Burghardt / July 17th, 2008
In
Planet of Slums, socialist historian Mike Davis mapped the brutal urban realities shared by more than one billion of the earth’s inhabitants, unmoored by neoliberal globalization from the “formal” world economy. From Baghdad to Karachi and from Lagos to Los Angeles and beyond, as ever-broader segments of the world’s population are transformed into “a surplus humanity,” the master class presents “no scenario” for ameliorating the immiseration it has itself designed through the “normal” functioning of a grotesque system of exploitation and injustice.
...
Under existent conditions, a racist discourse of “feral cities” haunts the imagination of military theoreticians. Considered a “breeding ground” of subversion by ruling class economists, politicians and sociologists, the urban battles of the future are being “wargamed” today.
Military Operations on Urban Terrain and Other Horrors of a Horrible SystemPentagon strategists refer to their doctrine of urban warfighting as Military Operations on Urban Terrain (
MOUT). But urban warfare pose multiple risks and challenges for military planners; not least of which are recognizing “targets” across a complex environment of multistory apartment blocks, small- and large scale industrial infrastructure, power grids, political and cultural centers, sports complexes, houses of worship and transportation hubs.
...
Masters and mistresses of American barrios and “ghettoes,” Brazilian favelas and South Asian chawls where even police fear to tread, rapid urbanization has radically undermined the high-tech advantages built-up by the U.S. since the dawn of the Cold War, thwarting American fantasies of “dominating the battlespace” through “network-centric warfare” (NCW).
According to NCW
theory, an alleged “information advantage” is leveraged into a competitive warfighting upper hand through “robust networking” of well-informed, though geographically dispersed forces. But as
the U.S. military discovered in Iraq, the high-tech systems built at a cost of tens of billions of dollars were brought to ground by disposable cell phones, garage door openers, twenty year old ordnance and the will to resist. Multiply radical neighborhood militias such as the “Tupamaros” on a planetary scale and it becomes abundantly clear that imperialism has its work cut out for it!
...
As a result of recent urban combat debacles, MOUT strategists are building simulated cities in the American outback as a “living laboratory” for protracted combat operations in an urban environment.
...
And at a cost of some $250 million, CAMOUT is slated to be the largest such facility owned by the Defense Department. Orbiting somewhere between war and entertainment, the Pentagon is designing a disquieting netherworld, a series of Potemkin villages whose sole purpose is to perfect its apparatus of death and destruction.
...
Adding to the mix, RAND researchers recommended that U.S. military planners consider the possibility of “appropriating” entire “ghost towns” within the continental U.S., in other words, cities that have been deindustrialized and largely abandoned. RAND “specialists” conclude: “the use of abandoned towns has moved beyond the concept phase into what might be considered the early test and development phase.”
...
Despite its abject failure against urban insurgents in Iraq, the U.S. military’s obsession with building simulation models of urban landscapes and electronic mapping suites of real cities tell us a great deal about the masters’ preoccupation–and fear–with the direction things are heading.
From the beginning of the Iraq 'war', U.S. defense firms billed the 'war' as a 'showcase' for their armament. So, its no surprise to learn that the military is lamenting about the failure of its billion dollar toys.
The military 'Urban Warfare' in Iraq stood out prominently to me because it did not entail just showcasing military hardware. From many readings, Urban Warfare in Iraq appear to include, midnight 'operations' where doors of Iraqi homes were kicked in, families were separated, separated family members were taken to different Abu Ghraibs, and, today, some Iraqi families do not know what happened to their love ones taken in the night.
When reading RAND's recommendations of “appropriating” entire “ghost towns” to meet Military Operations on Urban Terrain (MOUT) requirements. It occurred to me, appropriating entire "ghost towns" at one time may appear to be impossible but that task is easy enough to satisfy now. Today, there is a housing glut that presents little challenge to "appropriating" ghost or occupied towns.
Will the availability of "ghost towns" mean there will no longer be headlines in the future like
Mayor kicks Marines out of Toledo when the military decides to just drop in and conduct 'Urban' exercises?
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
