http://www.ocweekly.com/ink/04/28/cover-arellano.php(snip)
On Feb. 6, (U.S. Ambassasor) Argyros granted an exclusive newspaper interview—his first in over a year—to Berna Harbour of El País, the New York Times of Spain. The result was journalism at its hard-hitting best:
-Harbour: How do you feel being an American ambassador in a country so opposed to the policies of the United States?
-Argyros: Against some policies, not all. It’s not always easy when people aren’t in agreement with all the questions, but they’ll never be in agreement with everything—not even my wife.
-How does the United States think of confronting the rising opposition to the United States that pollsters are documenting in Europe?
-I don’t agree with you. I don’t think that Europe is against the United States. We have disagreements, and we’re always going to have disagreements with some questions. But I don’t have the feeling as ambassador that our disagreements are so serious so that we can’t be friends. We’re friends. We have a coalition of members, that’s why I’m not in agreement with you.
(snip)
How out of touch was Argyros with the people of Spain? Near the end of the interview, asked about the upcoming election in which Spaniards would sweep away Aznar, he maintained that Spain would continue to support the United States in the War on Terror even if Aznar lost. Why? Because "the major part of
is from Spain. We have more than 40 million Spanish speakers in the United States."
(snip)
In early February 2003, Argyros invited the leaders of all of Spain’s opposition political parties to the U.S. embassy for a breakfast. The topic: why they should support invading Iraq. Argyros scheduled his salon for Feb. 6, the day after Colin Powell would present the United Nations with "evidence" that Saddam Hussein had developed and was ready to use weapons of mass destruction. Feb. 6 was also a day before Aznar was to make his argument before the Spanish Parliament for his country’s role in any Iraq invasion.
But the politicians refused to attend, not because they were opposed to meeting Argyros but because they were offended at his insistence that the meeting take place at the U.S. Embassy. One political leader seethed that accepting Argyros’ invitation would transfer "Spanish sovereignty to the American embassy."
(snip)
In Argyros, Bush saw a valued lieutenant who collected $30 million as head of the California Republican Party’s fundraising arm during the 2000 presidential campaign, a famously venal businessman who doesn’t take no for an answer from anyone—even a nation of 41.5 million like Spain.
(snip)