Dissident Voice editorialist Justin Felux writes: When asked about the overthrow of Haiti's Aristide government in a television interview, Condoleezza Rice lent credibility to Hugo Chavez' claim that she is an illiterate by saying "we believe that President Aristide, in a sense, forfeited his ability to lead his people, because he did not govern democratically." She later said "Haiti is moving forward. There's a new President. There is a new prime minister. There is a new chief of police. There's an Eminent Persons Council that is trying to guide that process."....
Reports of atrocities in the countryside and the slums have been coming in on a daily basis. In one incident a container full of people was allegedly thrown into the water, allowing the people to drown. Another reported incident involved people being herded into an outhouse that was subsequently doused with gasoline and set on fire. None of these events have been confirmed, and it is unlikely that we will know the true scope of the atrocities for some time. Appeals are being made to human rights organizations to launch an investigation. In Port-au-Prince, people with dreadlocks, a hair style sometimes associated with a certain political culture, are reportedly being shot at night. Aid workers and missionaries who attempt to provide help to people are being intimidated by the armed gangs.
The disturbing events surrounding this crisis aren't limited to the island nation. Here in the United States, the media has played the role of cheerleader for the coup. White liberals, I am ashamed to say, have been eerily silent on this issue. Around the time of the coup there were a spate of articles and commentaries which lightly condemned the Bush administration, but most white liberals seem to have already forgotten where Haiti is on the map. Some have even fallen for the propaganda and declared Aristide's ouster a victory for human rights. The left should be up in arms over what this administration has done to Haiti, and not just for moral reasons...
These are questions that could put the Bush administration in a pretty awkward position, especially when it becomes clear that the US has been actively supporting the "armed opposition."
http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=16428http://www.pbase.com/image/13851992