Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush ‘Ignored Remarkably Prescient Warnings That Foretold The Financial Meltdown’»

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:17 PM
Original message
Bush ‘Ignored Remarkably Prescient Warnings That Foretold The Financial Meltdown’»


As the housing bubble burst and the ensuing economic crisis gained steam, conservatives set about trying to find someone to blame for the meltdown of the mortgage market. First, it was Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and then loans made to low-income people through the Community Reinvestment Act.

As The Wonk Room has noted, the problem was actually the Bush administration’s failure to regulate the mortgage markets, while financial institutions developed ever-more sophisticated instruments for securitizing mortgage debt and selling it around the world.

Today, the Associated Press offered more evidence of Bush’s failure, reporting that his administration “ignored remarkably prescient warnings that foretold the financial meltdown,” and “backed off proposed crackdowns on no-money-down, interest-only mortgages years before the economy collapsed, buckling to pressure from some of the same banks that have now failed.”

In 2005, banking regulators proposed a series of regulations that “reads like a list of what-ifs“:

- Regulators told bankers exotic mortgages were often inappropriate for buyers with bad credit.

- Banks would have been required to increase efforts to verify that buyers actually had jobs and could afford houses.

- Regulators proposed a cap on risky mortgages so a string of defaults wouldn’t be crippling.

- Banks that bundled and sold mortgages were told to be sure investors knew exactly what they were buying.

- Regulators urged banks to help buyers make responsible decisions and clearly advise them that interest rates might skyrocket and huge payments might be due sooner than expected.

“In hindsight, it was spot on,” but “people kind of looked at us regulators as old-fashioned,” said Jeffrey Brown, a former top official at the Office of Comptroller of the Currency. Indeed, the administration “trusted market forces and discounted the value of government intervention in the economy,” thus dismissing the proposed regulations.

Continued>>>
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/12/01/bush-warnings/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, he was stuck on the "economy is strong".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Goldman-Sachs Determined To Strike In US"
They probably put the warning in his PDB again -- they should know by know that he doesn't pay attention to that stuff. Besides, I'm sure that his advisers told him that it was just 'historic and analytic in nature.'

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Ooh good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Do you remember the Al Qaeda threats to Goldman-Sachs?
It was supposedly a hoax.

Letter to Newsday claims Goldman threat a hoax
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/am-gold0807,0,5999094.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't forget that very ignorant people have no foresight.
The same applies to his greedy advisers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
4.  “trusted market forces and discounted the value of government intervention in the
economy,” thus dismissing the proposed regulations.
As those proposed regulations would have hindered their attempts to perpetrate financial rape on the rest of us.

How did we ever allow people who believe
"Gubmint is da prublem"
to take over our government?

Oh yeah we were illegally overruled in a judicial coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. wow, he has never ignored warnings before, has he
oh wait
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. The media HELPED him ignore it. Did they discuss that part of the 2004 Dem platform
that Kerry personally put up, where he specifically targeted the need to ward off the impending mortgage and credit crisis?

Nah....just like when he warned of growing global terror efforts back in 1997, the issue just wasn't important to the corporate media and their talking heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's true. We need to stick it to them next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. They did more than ignore it- they actively suppressed information
partially because they had an interest in all the various advertising revenues that went along with the housing bubble and the cheap risky credit being tossed around by the Washington Mutuals of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I agree - and the reporters who TRY and report it are warned off by management.
I can't even tell you how many times stories were pulled by McClatchy, and they were one of the better news organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shocking! He ignored the financial equivalent of the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike Inside the US"
Presidential Daily Brief of August 6, 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, but it's something "nobody could have predicted".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. FBI warned him in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC