Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scalia did not have improper relations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 11:56 AM
Original message
Scalia did not have improper relations
http://www.benningtonbanner.com/Stories/0,1413,104~8670~2028477,00.html

Justice Antonin Scalia did not have duck-hunting relations with that vice president, Dick Cheney. So he wrote in a defiant, 21-page memorandum aimed at clearing his name of improper relations with the veep.

<snip>

Well, Scalia is trying to lay the critics to waste with the enlightening memo he penned and released Thursday. He writes that, despite public perception of an above-the-Washington-fray court, many justices hobnob with the politicos. Despite a perception of untarnished impartiality, justices often attend functions and pal around with the other insiders.

His duck-hunting trip with Cheney is no different. Actually it is less ominous than some other personal interactions, he wrote.

He wrote that during Christmas justices gathered at Cheney's home for some personal time. But on the hunting trip he and the veep were with 13 other people, including the vice president's security detail.

...more...

Well, I'm convinced now! Convinced that he is incapable of separating himself from the law - because he is the law! Oops - that was Delay - no - Delay is the Federal Government! Bush is America!

GACK!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. break out the cigars, and let's take a look at that blue robe...
...heh heh heh

on my way to the Seven Hundred Club, but first 666!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. "I never hunted in the same blind with the vice president"
Justice Scalia not only justified his participation in the case, he also disclosed new details of the trip. "I never hunted in the same blind with the vice president," he wrote.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/19/politics/19SCAL.html

I guess that makes the free duck hunting trip OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Let's not forget, the flight down there on Air Force 2.
Scalia is one rotten bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. "appearance of impropriety"
That defines scalia and cheney's duck hunting trip exactly. Not that scalia would ever admit he did anything wrong. He has the same problem as BFEE, if things look improper or like they lied, they just kill some constitutional right, to keep the lid on the whole stinking mess. Move on nothing to see here. Quack, Quack, Quack.

Arrogant lying bastards.

Sonia



http://www.showgeorgethedoor.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cheney gave Scalia a ride from D.C. to Louisiana
on air force 2, which for that flight was a Gulfstream V business jet.

It's about a 2 and a half hour flight each way, or five hours round trip.

Not counting the millions it cost to fly in the limos and secret service for Cheney, just the flight alone is worth about $10,000 per hour or $50,000 for the trip.

A Gulfstream V costs $40 million to buy and has direct operating costs of $3,000 per hour. When you factor in depreciation, pilots, insurance, repairs, and so forth, its at least a $10,000 per hour ride.

I don't EVEN want Scalia to tell me he didn't get a $50,000 bribe. Don't even THINK about suggesting that this sweet little trip wasn't a very very very big bribe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Spirit of JFK Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Semantics
Edited on Fri Mar-19-04 12:09 PM by The Spirit of JFK
Don't you know it all depends on what your definition of sex...uh...I mean "improper relations" is. ;)

* was just patting himself on the back about giving Iraq "an independent judiciary". I wish WE had one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yet the dispicable rethugs want Ruth Ginsberg to recuse on abortion cases
since she has spoken at NOW meetings.

the wrong wing has absolutely no intellectual integrity. they are liars to themselves and the world.

Death to Tyranny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Scalia's father certainly had improper relations
... with a hyena.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, judging by the amount of Hub-Bub this is causing
I'd say it fits within the criteria for recusing oneself. (The appearance of impropiety).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes.
Edited on Fri Mar-19-04 03:04 PM by Zookeeper
That's the bottom line: "The appearance of impropriety."

On second thought, shouldn't all of the Supreme Court Justices who appointed *Bush president be recused from decisions involving the Bush administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. I heard he claimed he was never alone in a duck blind with Cheney.
I, for one, am certainly relieved to hear that. The mind pictures alone are cause for an upset stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SendTheGOPPacking Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. I can just see his finger shaking - "I did not have sex with .."
Scalia is a rotten lying bastard. What a crock. What ever happened to the APPEARANCE of impropriety??

He HAS to be on that case to give Cheney a free ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Of course the duck hunting trip will not influence his vote; he has
known all along what it will be. He does not dare recuse himself for then Cheney might lose. Neither a-----e wants that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. Is this case being heard sometime this summer?
It was, the last time I checked. They haven't delayed it until after the election, have they?

If it goes the way Cheney and Scalia want it to go, it will look very bad for them. It could impact the campaign.

On the other hand, if we get to see all the dirt they did in their energy meetings, that will impact the campaign too.

Let's get those rotten lying bastards, one way or another!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Stall and stonewall.
He should recuse himself. If he doesn't within a few months the Dems should start an impeachment process on this azzhole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC