Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Tame Regulator for the SEC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:04 AM
Original message
A Tame Regulator for the SEC
President-elect Obama's appointment of Mary Schapiro to chair the Securities and Exchange Commission does not augur well for Obama's commitment to get at the roots of the financial crisis. Schapiro, who heads one of our broken financial system's main institutions of self-regulation, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, is known as a technically competent and politically moderate regulator who does not make waves. She served on the SEC beginning in 1988, having first been appointed by President Reagan.

The agency she heads is not a public agency at all. It is an industry trade association with quasi-regulatory functions delegated by the SEC. Under our ineffective system, a lot of regulatory authority is delegated to private institutions, such as the New York Stock Exchange, which is supposed to police the conduct of its members. We can see how well that worked out. When the exchange turned itself from a nonprofit into a for-profit company in 2006, its pseudo-regulatory functions had to be split off into a second private institution, the one that Schapiro heads, which was created in 2007 out of a merger with the National Association of Securities Dealers.

But the "Financial Services Regulatory Authority" is not a public body; it has little transparency, and if you have not heard of Mary Schapiro, it is because she has not been much of a player, much less a crusader, in the struggle for reform. She is the kind of Democratic appointment that allows Wall Street to breathe a huge sigh of relief.

And of course, her appointment is no accident. There were much tougher, more public minded appointees for SEC chair on the short list, but they were blocked by fierce industry lobbying warning that tough regulators would be divisive or controversial -- which they indeed would, if they did their jobs. Wall Street fundraisers for Obama used their ample access to resist a tough appointee. People in other power centers, like the Treasury and the White House, did not want a tough and independent SEC. If you think the appointment process exists in some kind of platonic post-ideological vacuum, get real.

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=a_tame_regulator_for_the_sec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sooo... I take it from this, Ms. Schapiro won't be carrying a baseball bat with 'The Regulator'...
stamped on it, like I would have.

*tsk*

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. She's more than tame. She's a crook!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bwahahahahaha! I'd explain my insane laughter but just let me say that
it's exactly what I expected!

Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I cannot say I expected this, but now I am finally wising up
Don't know whether to join you in your Bwahahahaha's or grab some tissue.

We're so screwn!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCarolinawoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sometimes you need a crusader....
and the is one of those times. You need someone who is not afraid of knocking heads together.

Trust has been broken and a "go along to get along person" will never get that trust back.

Bad appointment! :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC