Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9/11: For The Record by Condoleezza Rice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 05:11 AM
Original message
9/11: For The Record by Condoleezza Rice

9/11: For The Record http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13881-2004Mar21.html

By Condoleezza Rice
Monday, March 22, 2004; Page A21




During the transition, President-elect Bush's national security team was briefed on the Clinton administration's efforts to deal with al Qaeda. The seriousness of the threat was well understood by the president and his national security principals. In response to my request for a presidential initiative, the counterterrorism team, which we had held over from the Clinton administration, suggested several ideas, some of which had been around since 1998 but had not been adopted. No al Qaeda plan was turned over to the new administration.


Let us be clear. Even their most ardent advocates did not contend that these ideas, even taken together, would have destroyed al Qaeda. We judged that the collection of ideas presented to us were insufficient for the strategy President Bush sought. The president wanted more than a laundry list of ideas simply to contain al Qaeda or "roll back" the threat. Once in office, we quickly began crafting a comprehensive new strategy to "eliminate" the al Qaeda network. The president wanted more than occasional, retaliatory cruise missile strikes. He told me he was "tired of swatting flies."

Through the spring and summer of 2001, the national security team developed a strategy to eliminate al Qaeda -- which was expected to take years. Our strategy marshaled all elements of national power to take down the network, not just respond to individual attacks with law enforcement measures. Our plan called for military options to attack al Qaeda and Taliban leadership, ground forces and other targets -- taking the fight to the enemy where he lived. It focused on the crucial link between al Qaeda and the Taliban. We would attempt to compel the Taliban to stop giving al Qaeda sanctuary -- and if it refused, we would have sufficient military options to remove the Taliban regime. The strategy focused on the key role of Pakistan in this effort and the need to get Pakistan to drop its support of the Taliban. This became the first major foreign-policy strategy document of the Bush administration -- not Iraq, not the ABM Treaty, but eliminating al Qaeda.

Before Sept. 11, we closely monitored threats to our nation. President Bush revived the practice of meeting with the director of the CIA every day -- meetings that I attended. And I personally met with George Tenet regularly and frequently reviewed aspects of the counterterror effort.


Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence that terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as missiles, though some analysts speculated that terrorists might hijack airplanes to try to free U.S.-held terrorists. The FAA even issued a warning to airlines and aviation security personnel that "the potential for a terrorist operation, such as an airline hijacking to free terrorists incarcerated in the United States, remains a concern."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would give that a 7.9


The lies were crisp and concise....not a lot of twists.

The lies were delivered with candor and a sense of "authority"

It also lacked any personal attacks...

All in all a good performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. But still....
A rather large helping of lies.... How can she do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hmmm...I think its her job to lie...


Just a wild guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I thought it was McClellan's job to lie
Not only is this White House duplicitous, it duplicates its duplicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBitt Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Smart bunch.....
"We're dealing here with (someone) who thinks the Taliban is a rock band," Gloria Steinem said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. make sure you check out Josh Marshall's comments on this drivel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Since she had time to write this, she has
time to go before the 9/11 commission
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. ah, i see. the proposals at the time didn't justify an iraq invasion
so bu**sh** was right to do nothing.

makes perfect sense.

sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. A Phd.
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 06:31 AM by Disturbed
She has learned how to memorize and regurgiate...lies. Before anyone is hired for Bushco they must take a lie detector test. If they can fool the machine at least 80% they get the job. Sociopaths have an great advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Again............
they're framing the debate here stating that Clarke was "a holdover from the Clinton administration". No mention of Reagan and Bush the smarter. Clinton, Clinton, Clinton. They think that repeating this mantra will get them off the hook, because as everyone knows, Bill Clinton was THE WORST President we ever had.
Oh that he were still President. The world would not presently be in the turmoil that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Oh the irony.
Her piece is titled, "9-11: For the Record," implying that hers is the "real" version of what happened. If she wanted to state her version of events "for the record," she'd testify under oath before the 9-11 commission.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. another spin document
That piece of crap could only persuade the morons of the right wing! Anyone else with half a brain can tell it's all just bulls**t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Condy's credibility is zero.
Nobody believes what she says or has confidence in her notional security credentials. After all it was on her watch that 9-11 occured and that the invasion of Iraq was launched on the false premise that Iraq had WMDs. Why should we trust her judgement again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. After their claims that it took them by "surprise"
which is what they said immeadetly after 9-11 how can they come back and say they were so focused. They have to be lying about the situation one way or another. Which was it? Does anyone remember when the press crawled all over Hilary Clinton when about 8 months after 9-11 there was the release of the fact that * had been briefed on 8-6-01 about terrorist attacks and she claimed "what did bush know and when did he know it" They just about crucified her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. totally agree....
Your points are well taken.....they try to have it both ways, and that liberal press just lets them get away with it.

The press is just as guilty in allowing them to get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. regarding the 8-6-01 report
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 06:15 PM by jbfam4
Was that the one left on Bush's desk when he went on vacation? Might be a good question to ask tomorrow at the 9-11 panel. What happened to that report.....also did anyone in this administration read the Heart /Rudman report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC